Literature DB >> 7508785

An algorithm for prostate cancer detection in a patient population using prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density.

M C Benson1, D J McMahon, W H Cooner, C A Olsson.   

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most accurate serum marker for cancer of the prostate (CaP). However, its sensitivity and specificity are suboptimal, especially at values ranging between 4.1 and 10.0 ng/ml (monoclonal), because benign prostatic hypertrophy and hyperplasia (BPH) and CaP frequently coexist in this range. This study was undertaken to determine the value of incorporating prostate volume measurements with serum PSA levels in a quotient (PSA/volume) entitled PSA density (PSAD). A total of 3140 patients were analyzed and stratified by serum PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal prostate ultrasound (TRUS), TRUS volume determination and PSAD. All patients were referred for evaluation and therefore do not represent a screened population. Patients underwent prostate biopsies when abnormalities in TRUS or DRE were detected. Although both PSA and PSAD have statistical significance when the serum PSA value is < or = 4.0 ng/ml, neither has clinical significance in differentiating BPH from CaP. At serum levels ranging between 4.1 and 10.0 ng/ml, PSA has no ability to differentiate BPH from CaP, whereas PSAD does so with statistical and clinical significance. When the PSA value is between 10.1 and 20.0 ng/ml, only PSAD is statistically significant. When PSA exceeds 20 ng/ml, PSAD is redundant. We conclude that all patients with an abnormality on DRE or TRUS should undergo prostate biopsy. If the PSA value is < or = 4.0 ng/ml, TRUS and PSAD are not warranted and routine biopsy is not recommended. For intermediate PSA levels, 4.1-10.0 ng/ml, TRUS, TRUS prostate volume, and PSAD are important.2_

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7508785     DOI: 10.1007/bf00185070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  19 in total

Review 1.  The use of transrectal prostatic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  R L Waterhouse; M I Resnick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  T A Stamey; N Yang; A R Hay; J E McNeal; F S Freiha; E Redwine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Serum prostate-specific antigen: its use in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  P H Lange; M K Brawer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. I. Untreated patients.

Authors:  T A Stamey; J N Kabalin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Prostate-specific antigen and prostate gland volume: correlation and clinical application.

Authors:  R J Babaian; H A Fritsche; R B Evans
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer.

Authors:  M C Benson; I S Whang; A Pantuck; K Ring; S A Kaplan; C A Olsson; W H Cooner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The use of prostate specific antigen density to enhance the predictive value of intermediate levels of serum prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  M C Benson; I S Whang; C A Olsson; D J McMahon; W H Cooner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Clinical application of transrectal ultrasonography and prostate specific antigen in the search for prostate cancer.

Authors:  W H Cooner; B R Mosley; C L Rutherford; J H Beard; H S Pond; R B Bass; W J Terry
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  An evaluation of prostate specific antigen in prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P Guinan; R Bhatti; P Ray
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Monoclonal antibody (F5) to human prostate antigen.

Authors:  L D Papsidero; G A Croghan; M C Wang; M Kuriyama; E A Johnson; L A Valenzuela; T M Chu
Journal:  Hybridoma       Date:  1983
View more
  7 in total

1.  PSA density versus risk stratification for lymphadenectomy-making decision in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  "Finding the needle in a haystack": oncologic evaluation of patients treated for LUTS with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Authors:  Annika Herlemann; Kerstin Wegner; Alexander Roosen; Alexander Buchner; Philipp Weinhold; Alexander Bachmann; Christian G Stief; Christian Gratzke; Giuseppe Magistro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The importance of prostate volume in prostate needle biopsy.

Authors:  Ömer Gökhan Doluoğlu; Çetin Volkan Öztekin; Mehmet Karabakan; Alp Özgür Akdemir; Mesut Çetinkaya
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-06

4.  Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and Prostate Volume: Better Predictor of Prostate Cancer for Bosnian and Herzegovina Men.

Authors:  Jozo Coric; Jasminka Mujic; Elma Kucukalic; Daria Ler
Journal:  Open Biochem J       Date:  2015-05-15

5.  Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate Health Index in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Shih-Ting Chiu; Yung-Ting Cheng; Yeong-Shiau Pu; Yu-Chuan Lu; Jian-Hua Hong; Shiu-Dong Chung; Chih-Hung Chiang; Chao-Yuan Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Clinical significance of multiparametric MRI and PSA density as predictors of residual tumor (pT0) following radical prostatectomy for T1a-T1b (incidental) prostate cancer.

Authors:  Doo Yong Chung; Hyeok Jun Goh; Dong Hoon Koh; Min Seok Kim; Jong Soo Lee; Won Sik Jang; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The use of prostate specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Igor Yusim; Muhammad Krenawi; Elad Mazor; Victor Novack; Nicola J Mabjeesh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.