Literature DB >> 7508070

Aprotinin for coronary bypass operations: efficacy, safety, and influence on early saphenous vein graft patency. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

J H Lemmer1, W Stanford, S L Bonney, J F Breen, E V Chomka, W J Eldredge, W W Holt, R B Karp, G W Laub, M J Lipton.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprotinin in a U.S. population of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Early vein graft patency rates were assessed by ultrafast computed tomography. A total of 216 patients at five centers were randomized to receive either high-dose aprotinin or placebo during the operation; 151 patients underwent primary operation, and 65 underwent repeat procedures. Total blood product exposures in the primary group were 2.2 per patient receiving aprotinin as compared with 5.7 per patient receiving placebo (p = 0.010). The repeat group had 0.3 exposures per patient receiving aprotinin as compared with 10.7 per patient receiving placebo (p = < 0.001). Consistent reductions in the percent of patients requiring donor red blood cells and in the number of units of platelets, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate required were associated with the use of aprotinin in both primary and repeat groups. Mortality was 5.6% in the aprotinin group and 3.7% in the placebo group (p = 0.517). In the primary group, clinical diagnoses of myocardial infarction were made in 8.9% of patients receiving aprotinin as compared with 5.6% of the patients receiving placebo (p = 0.435). In the repeat group, infarctions occurred in 10.3% of patients receiving aprotinin and 8.3% of patients receiving placebo (p = 1.000). Secondary analysis of electrocardiograms and available enzyme data showed no significant difference in infarction rates between the treatment groups. There was no difference in clinically significant renal dysfunction. The early vein graft patency rates were 92.0% in the aprotinin group and 95.1% in the placebo group (p = 0.248). In this study, aprotinin was effective in reducing bleeding and blood product transfusion rates, and its use was not associated with an increase in complications. An adverse effect on early vein graft patency rates was not demonstrated, but the number of grafts assessed was insufficient for absolute conclusions in this regard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7508070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  18 in total

Review 1.  The hemostatic defect of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Matthew Dean Linden
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Is there still a role for aprotinin in cardiac surgery?

Authors:  Neel R Sodha; Munir Boodhwani; Frank W Sellke
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Natural and synthetic antifibrinolytics in adult cardiac surgery: efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency.

Authors:  J F Hardy; S Bélisle
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  A risk-benefit assessment of aprotinin in cardiac surgical procedures.

Authors:  W B Dobkowski; J M Murkin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Aprotinin: an update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in open heart surgery and coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  D C Peters; S Noble
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Aprotinin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in reducing blood loss associated with cardiac surgery.

Authors:  R Davis; R Whittington
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  [Aprotinin and recombinant human erythropoietin reduce the need for homologous blood transfusion in cardiac surgery].

Authors:  M Osaka; I Fukuda; H Ohuchi
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-09

Review 8.  The safety of aprotinin and lysine-derived antifibrinolytic drugs in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David Henry; Paul Carless; Dean Fergusson; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Perioperative management of antiplatelet-drugs in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Raquel Ferrandis; Juan V Llau; Ana Mugarra
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-05

10.  Can local application of Tranexamic acid reduce post-coronary bypass surgery blood loss? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hosam Fawzy; Elsayed Elmistekawy; Daniel Bonneau; David Latter; Lee Errett
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.