Literature DB >> 7506368

The propensity for gene amplification: a comparison of protocols, cell lines, and selection agents.

R C Sharma1, R T Schimke.   

Abstract

We have studied cell lines of rodent and human origin for their propensity to become resistant to antifolates (methotrexate, trimetrexate), phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), and colcemid, resistances associated with amplification of the DHFR, CAD, and MDR1 genes, respectively. We have employed two different methods: (1) a shallow step-wise selection protocol, where time to attain specified resistance is the quantitative measure, (2) the frequency of resistant colonies at specified drug concentrations. Although there are advantages and disadvantages to both methods, the two methods gave the same relative ranking of cell lines. Striking differences in the propensity for gene amplification (resistance) were found: human cell lines were less prone to amplify genes than Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. This ranking was similar with all of the agents employed. Additionally, we observed that whereas PALA resistance in CHO cells is associated with amplification of the CAD gene, PALA resistance in the two human cell lines studied (HeLaS3 and VA13) was not associated with amplification and/or overexpression of the CAD gene, and thus this resistance to PALA occurs by an unknown mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7506368     DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90217-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  7 in total

1.  Interchromosomal gene conversion at an endogenous human cell locus.

Authors:  P J Quintana; E A Neuwirth; A J Grosovsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Multiple mechanisms of N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate resistance in human cell lines: carbamyl-P synthetase/aspartate transcarbamylase/dihydro-orotase gene amplification is frequent only when chromosome 2 is rearranged.

Authors:  K A Smith; O B Chernova; R P Groves; M B Stark; J L Martínez; J N Davidson; J M Trent; T E Patterson; A Agarwal; P Duncan; M L Agarwal; G R Stark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Inhibition of apoptosis by overexpressing Bcl-2 enhances gene amplification by a mechanism independent of aphidicolin pretreatment.

Authors:  D X Yin; R T Schimke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Inefficient growth arrest in response to dNTP starvation stimulates gene amplification through bridge-breakage-fusion cycles.

Authors:  M F Poupon; K A Smith; O B Chernova; C Gilbert; G R Stark
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Increased production of recombinant hIGFBP-1 in PEG induced autofusion of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.

Authors:  C Dyring
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 6.  Regulation of cancer metastasis by stress pathways.

Authors:  Keping Xie; Suyun Huang
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  Repression of mutagenesis by Rad51D-mediated homologous recombination.

Authors:  John M Hinz; Robert S Tebbs; Paul F Wilson; Peter B Nham; Edmund P Salazar; Hatsumi Nagasawa; Salustra S Urbin; Joel S Bedford; Larry H Thompson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 16.971

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.