Literature DB >> 7505918

Interatrial conduction in patients undergoing AV stimulation: effects of increasing right atrial stimulation rate.

J P Camous1, F Raybaud, C Dolisi, A Schenowitz, A Varenne, M Baudouy.   

Abstract

To evaluate the frequency of spontaneous or rate dependent interatrial blocks, the interatrial conduction time (IACT) was studied on 100 consecutive patients (mean age 78.3 +/- 7.8 years) during a transvenous dual chamber pacemaker implant. The spontaneous interatrial conduction time (SIACT) was measured from the intrinsic deflection (ID) of the unipolar right atrial signal to the ID of the left atrial signal recorded in a bipolar way by an esophageal lead. The paced interatrial conduction time (PIACT) was measured from the stimulus artifact to the left atrial ID, when the atrium was paced at a slightly higher rate than the spontaneous rate and during incremental atrial pacing. From these measurements, the maximum increase of PIACT (MIPIACT) was deduced. In this elderly population, the PIACT was similar (117 +/- 26.9 msec) to the data in the literature. However, there were large interindividual variations that were also found in SIACT. We found a close correlation between SIACT and PIACT (P < 0.0001). PIACT was on average 50 msec longer than SIACT. SIACT increased with age (P < 0.03). The MIPIACT was 15.3 +/- 15.2 msec. In the majority of patients, the MIPIACT was > 10 msec, and even reached 90 msec in one patient. MIPIACT was longer in patients with a PIACT exceeding 110 msec (P < 0.004). Based on IACT alone, the AV interval must be lengthened on average by 50 msec when changing from atrial tracking-ventricular pacing to atrial pacing-ventricular pacing, but large individual differences must be kept in mind. Elderly people should probably have a longer AV delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7505918     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01010.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  The search for optimal atrioventricular interval.

Authors:  I Eli Ovsyshcher
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Utilization of Electrocardiographic P-wave Duration for AV Interval Optimization in Dual-Chamber Pacemakers.

Authors:  Dan Sorajja; Mayurkumar D Bhakta; Luis Rp Scott; Gregory T Altemose; Komandoor Srivathsan
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-09-05

3.  Atrial electromechanical sequence in normal subjects and patients with DDD pacemakers.

Authors:  K Wang; H B Xiao; S Fujimoto; D G Gibson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-10

4.  Echocardiographic AV-interval optimization in patients with reduced left ventricular function.

Authors:  C Melzer; A C Borges; F Knebel; W S Richter; W Combs; G Baumann; H Theres
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 2.062

5.  Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial-pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT.

Authors:  Andreas Kyriacou; Christopher A Rajkumar; Punam A Pabari; S M Afzal Sohaib; Keith Willson; Nicholas S Peters; Phang B Lim; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Alun D Hughes; Jamil Mayet; Zachary I Whinnett; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.976

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.