Literature DB >> 7505870

Prostate-specific antigen: concepts for staging prostate cancer and monitoring response to therapy.

H C Ruckle1, G G Klee, J E Oesterling.   

Abstract

FINDINGS: The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level alone does not facilitate precise pathologic staging on an individual basis, although advanced stage tends to correlate with an increased PSA level. The staging accuracy of PSA, however, can be enhanced by considering the variables of tumor grade and clinical stage. Staging radionuclide bone scans in asymptomatic, untreated patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and a PSA value of less than 10.0 ng/mL are unnecessary. After radical prostatectomy, the serum PSA level is exquisitely sensitive to recurrent or residual disease. Ultrasensitive PSA assays can increase the sensitivity of PSA as a tumor marker after surgical removal of the prostate. Currently, however, the clinical usefulness of PSA concentrations detected in the ultrasensitive range after radical prostatectomy is unknown. Serum PSA values aid in monitoring patients who have received definitive radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Patients in whom the serum PSA level decreases to the reference range have a favorable prognosis. An increasing serum PSA concentration after radiation therapy heralds progressive prostate cancer. The serum PSA level after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) also has prognostic importance in that a decrease to the normal range predicts a prolonged remission in most patients. Because expression of PSA is under direct hormonal influence, however, ADT can decrease the serum PSA value independent of antitumorigenic activity. Patients who have received ADT must be closely monitored for signs of clinical progression because, in some patients, a serum PSA concentration within the reference range may underestimate actual tumor burden and activity.
CONCLUSION: PSA is the most useful and accurate tumor marker for staging and monitoring prostate cancer after therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7505870     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61615-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  10 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Mazhar; J Waxman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring of a Patient with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor by Next-Generation Sequencing and Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay of a PDGFRA Mutation in Plasma-Derived Cell-Free Tumor DNA.

Authors:  Pieter A Boonstra; Arja Ter Elst; Marco Tibbesma; Jourik A Gietema; Ed Schuuring; Anna K L Reyners
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-01-22

Review 3.  Stage T1c prostate cancer: defining the appropriate staging evaluation and the role for pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  M C Beduschi; R Beduschi; J E Oesterling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Utility of SPECT imaging for determination of vertebral metastases in patients with known primary tumors.

Authors:  D L Bushnell; D Kahn; B Huston; C G Bevering
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Modeling Androgen Deprivation Therapy-Induced Prostate Cancer Dormancy and Its Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Xin Dong; Hui Xue; Fan Mo; Yen-Yi Lin; Dong Lin; Nelson K Y Wong; Yingqiang Sun; Scott Wilkinson; Anson T Ku; Jun Hao; Xinpei Ci; Rebecca Wu; Anne Haegert; Rebecca Silver; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Steven P Balk; Joshi J Alumkal; Adam G Sowalsky; Martin Gleave; Colin Collins; Yuzhuo Wang
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.333

Review 6.  12th meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals: susceptibility to environmental hazards.

Authors:  J C Barrett; H Vainio; D Peakall; B D Goldstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Production and Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies against Human Prostate Specific Antigen.

Authors:  Ali Ahmad Bayat; Roya Ghods; Mahdi Shabani; Ahmad Reza Mahmoudi; Omid Yeganeh; Hadi Hassannia; Ali Sadeghitabar; Leila Balay-Goli; Farzaneh Noutash-Haghighat; Ali Reza Sarrafzadeh; Mahmood Jeddi-Tehrani
Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Performance and Impact of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Based Diagnostics in the Management of Men with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer and its Role in Salvage Lymph Node Dissection.

Authors:  Marieke J Krimphove; Lena H Theissen; Alexander P Cole; Felix Preisser; Philipp C Mandel; Felix K H Chun
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 9.  Imaging metastatic bone disease from carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  C Messiou; G Cook; N M deSouza
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  CDC6 mRNA Expression Is Associated with the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ye-Hwan Kim; Young Joon Byun; Won Tae Kim; Pildu Jeong; Chunri Yan; Ho Won Kang; Yong-June Kim; Sang-Cheol Lee; Sung-Kwon Moon; Yung-Hyun Choi; Seok Joong Yun; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 2.153

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.