Literature DB >> 7503598

Complementary medicine. What physicians think of it: a meta-analysis.

E Ernst1, K L Resch, A R White.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complementary (or alternative) medicine has become a prevalent phenomenon in most industrialized countries. At present the evidence from randomized controlled trials investigating its effectiveness is fragmentary and therefore inconclusive.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians perceive complementary medicine as useful and/or effective.
METHOD: A literature search was performed to retrieve all relevant articles. Twelve surveys addressing this question were found and analyzed by evaluating perceived usefulness and/or effectiveness.
RESULTS: The results show a remarkable variability between surveys. On average physicians perceive complementary medicine as moderately effective--the rating was 46 +/- 18 on a scale of 0 to 100 points. Young physicians seem to judge complementary medicine more optimistically than their more seasoned colleagues. There is no trend to suggest that complementary medicine is increasingly perceived as useful and/or effective. The data do not answer the question whether physicians view complementary medicine as a nonspecific powerful placebo or as specifically effective.
CONCLUSION: Complementary medicine may be useful; however, the notion urgently needs to be tested in randomized controlled trials.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7503598     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.155.22.2405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  16 in total

1.  Can doctors respond to patients' increasing interest in complementary and alternative medicine?

Authors:  D K Owen; G Lewith; C R Stephens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-20

2.  Characteristics of physician's assistant programs.

Authors:  R E Jewett
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1975-12

Review 3.  Rheumatologists' opinions towards complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Grainger; Jennifer Walker
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Emotionless holism: factor and Rasch analysis of the Chinese Integrative Medicine Attitude Questionnaire.

Authors:  Vincent Chung; Marc Chong; Lau Chun Hong; Polly H X Ma; Samuel Y S Wong; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 5.  Patterns and perceptions of complementary/alternative medicine among paediatricians and patients' mothers: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Laura Cuzzolin; Silvana Zaffani; Vitalia Murgia; Michele Gangemi; Giorgio Meneghelli; Giampietro Chiamenti; Giuseppina Benoni
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Physicians' perspectives on massage therapy.

Authors:  M J Verhoef; S A Page
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Use of complementary therapies by patients attending musculoskeletal clinics.

Authors:  A Chandola; Y Young; J McAlister; J S Axford
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  A Review of Integrative Medicine in Gynaecological Oncology.

Authors:  M Kalder; T Müller; D Fischer; A Müller; W Bader; M W Beckmann; C Brucker; C C Hack; V Hanf; A Hasenburg; A Hein; S Jud; M Kiechle; E Klein; D Paepke; A Rotmann; F Schütz; G Dobos; P Voiß; S Kümmel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  What rheumatologists in the United States think of complementary and alternative medicine: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Nisha J Manek; Cynthia S Crowson; Abigale L Ottenberg; Farr A Curlin; Ted J Kaptchuk; Jon C Tilburt
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.659

10.  Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Physicians in Oriental Medicine Hospitals in Vietnam: A Hospital-Based Survey.

Authors:  Duong Duc Pham; Jong Hyang Yoo; Binh Quoc Tran; Thuy Thu Ta
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.