Literature DB >> 7503521

Decision making in primary surgical repair of myelomeningoceles.

T M de Chalain1, S R Cohen, F D Burstein, R J Hudgins, W R Boydston, M S O'Brien.   

Abstract

A 5-year review of 43 consecutive patients presenting to Scottish Rite Children's Medical Center with an open myelomeningocele defect was undertaken. The aim of the present study was to analyze the myelomeningocele defects, dimensions, and area to better define those factors that dictate the need for plastic surgical consultation for wound closure. Of the 43 patients identified, two were excluded because they first presented as older children; the remaining 41 all had their myelomeningoceles repaired within the first 36 hours of life. Of these, 31 underwent repair by the Neurosurgical Service, whereas for 10 patients (24.4%), the Plastic Surgery Service was asked to assist with closure. Comparison showed the mean (+/- standard deviation) area in the referred patients was 27.4 (7.6) cm2 versus 17.6 (7.9) cm2 in the patients not referred for closure (p = 0.002). A trend analysis predicting referral as a function of myelomeningocele area showed that 0 of 10 (0%) with an area of less than 15 cm2, 2 of 13 (15.4%) with an area equal to 15 to 20 cm2, 3 of 7 (42.9%) with an area of 21 to 25 cm2, and 4 of 9 (44%) with an area greater than 25 cm2 were referred (p = 0.001). Data from the interpretation of maximum myelomeningocele dimension also showed statistically significant trends in referral. Using multiple logistic regression, it was found that the odds of referral increased by a factor of 3.3 for every 1 cm increase in maximum dimension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7503521     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199509000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  5 in total

1.  Soft tissue closure and plastic surgical aspects of large dorsal myelomeningocele defects (review of techniques).

Authors:  Derya Ozçelik; Kartal Hakan Yildiz; Merih Iş; Murat Döşoğlu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Local and regional flap closure in myelomeningocele repair: a 15-year review.

Authors:  Samuel C Lien; Cormac O Maher; Hugh J L Garton; Steven J Kasten; Karin M Muraszko; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Evaluation and Management of Lumbosacral Myelomeningoceles in Children.

Authors:  Cahit Kural; Ilker Solmaz; Ozkan Tehli; Caglar Temiz; Murat Kutlay; Mehmet K Daneyemez; Yusuf Izci
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2015-10

4.  Closure of meningomyelocele defects using various types of keystone-design perforator island flaps.

Authors:  Nandita Melati Putri; Narottama Tunjung; Patricia Marcellina Sadikin
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-15

5.  How much do plastic surgeons add to the closure of myelomeningoceles?

Authors:  Rhian Bevan; Nicholas Wilson-Jones; Imran Bhatti; Chirag Patel; Paul Leach
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 1.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.