E D Balbach1, S A Glantz. 1. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0124, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study compared tobacco-related articles from two elementary school publications, Weekly Reader and Scholastic News, published in 1989 through 1994. METHODS: Articles for grades 4 through 6 were evaluated, and the publications were compared with each other. Also, issues of Weekly Reader published after acquisition by K-III, which is owned by the firm that formerly owned RJR Tobacco, were compared with the earlier ones. RESULTS: Weekly Reader was less likely than Scholastic News to mention short-term consequences of smoking (32% vs 64%) or to give a clear "no-use" message (35% vs 79%). Weekly Reader was more likely to give the tobacco industry position (68% vs 32%). Post-K-III issues of Weekly Reader were less likely to provide a clear no-use message than earlier ones (62% vs 24%). CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals need to monitor the health information carried in these publications, which reach between 1 and 2 million students per grade level each week. Although neither publication had perfect tobacco coverage, Scholastic News was significantly better than Weekly Reader.
OBJECTIVES: This study compared tobacco-related articles from two elementary school publications, Weekly Reader and Scholastic News, published in 1989 through 1994. METHODS: Articles for grades 4 through 6 were evaluated, and the publications were compared with each other. Also, issues of Weekly Reader published after acquisition by K-III, which is owned by the firm that formerly owned RJR Tobacco, were compared with the earlier ones. RESULTS: Weekly Reader was less likely than Scholastic News to mention short-term consequences of smoking (32% vs 64%) or to give a clear "no-use" message (35% vs 79%). Weekly Reader was more likely to give the tobacco industry position (68% vs 32%). Post-K-III issues of Weekly Reader were less likely to provide a clear no-use message than earlier ones (62% vs 24%). CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals need to monitor the health information carried in these publications, which reach between 1 and 2 million students per grade level each week. Although neither publication had perfect tobacco coverage, Scholastic News was significantly better than Weekly Reader.
Authors: J R DiFranza; J W Richards; P M Paulman; N Wolf-Gillespie; C Fletcher; R D Jaffe; D Murray Journal: JAMA Date: 1991-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272