Literature DB >> 7502230

Prophylactic irradiation of para-aortic lymph nodes in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A prospective randomized study.

M Chatani1, Y Matayoshi, N Masaki, Y Narumi, T Teshima, T Inoue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: For assessment of the advantages and side effects of para-aortic lymph nodes irradiation under the evaluation by computer tomography, a prospective randomized study was started in 1986. The results for survival, local control and late complications are presented in the following. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1986 to October 1990, 93 patients with cervical carcinoma were randomly allocated for treatment with either pelvic irradiation (pelvic group) or pelvic plus para-aortic lymph nodes irradiation (para-aortic group). Thirty-six patients underwent external irradiation and intracavitary therapy (RT arm) and 57 patients, extended radical hysterectomy and external irradiation (OP-RT arm). Para-aortic lymph nodes irradiation delivered 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy per day for 5 days per week through anterior-posterior fields.
RESULTS: The 3-year cause specific survival rates were para-aortic group: 57% and pelvic group: 89% in RT arm group, and para-aortic group: 70% and pelvic group: 86% in OP-RT arm group. Differences for the 2 groups in each treatment arm were not significant. In pelvic failure, para-aortic lymph nodes metastases and distant metastases showed no statistically significant differences for the 2 groups in each treatment arm. In the para-aortic group, complications were more frequent than in the pelvic group (13/45 vs. 2/48, p < 0.025). As an enteric complication ileus was found in 7% (3/45) of the para-aortic group while 2% (1/48) in the pelvic group. Compression fractures of the lumber vertebral body were apparent in 9% (4/45) and 0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Routine para-aortic lymph nodes irradiation delivered through anterior-posterior fields for high risk patients with cervical carcinoma is of limited value occurring to the high incidence of late complications and this treatment fails to improve no survival rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7502230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Elly Brockbank; Fani Kokka; Andrew Bryant; Christophe Pomel; Karina Reynolds
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 2.  Does para-aortic irradiation reduce the risk of distant metastasis in advanced cervical cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Lucas Gomes Sapienza; Maria José Leite Gomes; Vinicius Fernando Calsavara; Mario M Leitao; Glauco Baiocchi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Extended field chemoradiation for cervical cancer patients with histologically proven para-aortic lymph node metastases after laparaoscopic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Johanna Schram; Volker Budach; Irina Sackerer; Giuseppe Filiberto Vercellino; Jalid Sehouli; Christhardt Köhler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy of the cervical cancer. Prognostic factors and complications.

Authors:  M Chatani; T Nose; N Masaki; T Inoue
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Elly Brockbank; Fani Kokka; Andrew Bryant; Christophe Pomel; Karina Reynolds
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

6.  Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study.

Authors:  Philip Chan; Inhwan Yeo; Gregory Perkins; Anthony Fyles; Michael Milosevic
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Is Prophylactic Irradiation to Para-aortic Lymph Nodes in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Necessary?

Authors:  Seung Gyu Park; Jin Hee Kim; Young Kee Oh; Sang Jun Byun; Mi Young Kim; Sang Hoon Kwon; Ok Bae Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Evaluation of the efficacy of prophylactic extended field irradiation in the concomitant chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, stage IIIB in the 2018 FIGO classification.

Authors:  Qingyu Meng; Xiaoliang Liu; Weiping Wang; Xiaorong Hou; Xin Lian; Shuai Sun; Junfang Yan; Zhikai Liu; Zheng Miao; Ke Hu; Fuquan Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Extended-field radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Komsan Thamronganantasakul; Narudom Supakalin; Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Porjai Pattanittum; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-26

10.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy in carcinoma cervix with metastatic para-aortic nodes: an institutional experience from a Regional Cancer Centre of Eastern India.

Authors:  Misra Biplab; Maji Tapas; Lahiri Debarshi; Roy Sanjoy; Chaudhuri Prabir; Ray K Dilip
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-06-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.