STUDY DESIGN: Patients presenting with L5-S1 anterior column disease with or without herniation into the spinal canal but without stenosis underwent magnetic resonance imaging screening before surgery to determine surgical suitability for laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion relative to the aortic bifurcation and approach to the disc space. OBJECTIVES: To analyze and evaluate the laparoscopic approach, technique, and benefit of anterior lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion by distraction and compression-loading of autograft only as compared with cage-spacer-enhanced autograft fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Advancement in minimally invasive spine surgery techniques has provided options with less morbidity for posterior lumbar procedures. General surgical advancements in laparoscopy and advantages of traditional anterior lumbar interbody fusion, including restoration of disc height and exposure for safe nerve decompression, provided a basis for an integrated procedure that would address anterior column abnormality with low surgical morbidity. METHODS: Five patients underwent technically successful laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion with approach to the disc space by an experienced laparoscopic general surgeon. A sixth patient in the study group was unable to undergo laparoscopic fusion because of an iliac vein tear during the surgical approach. After the approach, a spine surgeon followed with complete manual discectomy and interbody autogenous fusion laparoscopically. Two to three Cloward-type dowels were obtained by separate incision from the anterior iliac crest. RESULTS: All patients by 6-month follow-up examination were clinically fused with no motion on flexion-extension radiographs. One patient had slight anterior retropulsion of one dowel without the necessity of reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis may represent a viable option for patients with abnormality, including anterior column and degenerative disc disease.
STUDY DESIGN:Patients presenting with L5-S1 anterior column disease with or without herniation into the spinal canal but without stenosis underwent magnetic resonance imaging screening before surgery to determine surgical suitability for laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion relative to the aortic bifurcation and approach to the disc space. OBJECTIVES: To analyze and evaluate the laparoscopic approach, technique, and benefit of anterior lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion by distraction and compression-loading of autograft only as compared with cage-spacer-enhanced autograft fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Advancement in minimally invasive spine surgery techniques has provided options with less morbidity for posterior lumbar procedures. General surgical advancements in laparoscopy and advantages of traditional anterior lumbar interbody fusion, including restoration of disc height and exposure for safe nerve decompression, provided a basis for an integrated procedure that would address anterior column abnormality with low surgical morbidity. METHODS: Five patients underwent technically successful laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion with approach to the disc space by an experienced laparoscopic general surgeon. A sixth patient in the study group was unable to undergo laparoscopic fusion because of an iliac vein tear during the surgical approach. After the approach, a spine surgeon followed with complete manual discectomy and interbody autogenous fusion laparoscopically. Two to three Cloward-type dowels were obtained by separate incision from the anterior iliac crest. RESULTS: All patients by 6-month follow-up examination were clinically fused with no motion on flexion-extension radiographs. One patient had slight anterior retropulsion of one dowel without the necessity of reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis may represent a viable option for patients with abnormality, including anterior column and degenerative disc disease.
Authors: J Y Lazennec; B Pouzet; S Ramare; N Mora; S Hansen; R Trabelsi; H Guérin-Surville; G Saillant Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 1999 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer; Christoph Zandanell; Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Anubhav Agrawal; Aly Abayazeed; Sean L Francis; Jocelyn Tolentino; Donald R Ostergard; Albert Seow; Eric Van Bogaert; Timothy Rose; Nicolette E Deveneau; Ali Azadi Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Péter Banczerowski; Gábor Czigléczki; Zoltán Papp; Róbert Veres; Harry Zvi Rappaport; János Vajda Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Sang Ki Chung; Sang Ho Lee; Sang Rak Lim; Dong-Yun Kim; Jee Soo Jang; Ki-Se Nam; Ho Yeon Lee Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2003-10-17 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Constantine T Frantzides; Tallal M Zeni; Frank M Phillips; Sameer Mathur; John G Zografakis; Ronald M Moore; Luis E Laguna Journal: JSLS Date: 2006 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.172