Literature DB >> 7500750

Risk of idiopathic cardiovascular death and nonfatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives with differing progestagen components.

H Jick1, S S Jick, V Gurewich, M W Myers, C Vasilakis.   

Abstract

Concern about the risks of cardiovascular illness in women using combined oral contraceptives (OC) containing the progestagens desogestrel and gestodene prompted two studies of data from the UK General Practice Research Database. We compared the risks of certain cardiovascular illnesses in otherwise healthy women exposed to one of three OCs containing < 35 micrograms oestrogen plus levonorgestrel, desogestrel, or gestodene. In the first study, based on some 470 general practices, there were 15 cases of unexpected idiopathic cardiovascular death among 303,470 women who were current users of one of the study OCs. The estimated incidence rates were 8/184,536 (4.3 per 100,000) woman-years at risk for users of combined OCs containing levonorgestrel, 2/135,567 (1.5 per 100,000) for desogestrel users, and 5/105,201 (4.8 per 100,000) for gestodene users. The relative risk (RR) estimates were 0.4 (95% CI 0.1-2.1) and 1.4 (CI 0.5-4.5) for desogestrel and gestodene, respectively, compared with levonorgestrel. In the second study, derived from some 370 general practices, there were 80 cases of nonfatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a cohort of 238,130 otherwise healthy women. The incidence rates of VTE per 100,000 woman-years at risk were 16.1 for levonorgestrel users, 29.3 for desogestrel, and 28.1 for gestodene. The adjusted RR estimates from the cohort analysis were 1.9 (1.1-3.2) and 1.8 (1.0-3.2) for desogestrel and gestodene users, respectively, compared with users of levonorgestrel. In a nested case-control analysis the adjusted matched RR estimates were 2.2 (1.1-4.4) and 2.1 (1.0-4.4) for desogestrel and gestodene users, respectively, compared with users of levonorgestrel. The excess risk for nonfatal VTE associated with the new generation of combined OCs containing low-dose oestrogen and the progestagens desogestrel or gestodene compared with levonorgestrel is estimated to be 16 per 100,000 woman-years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Cardiovascular Effects; Case Control Studies; Cohort Analysis; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Methods; Demographic Factors; Desogestrel; Developed Countries; Diseases; Embolism; Europe; Excess Mortality--women; Family Planning; Gestodene; Incidence; Levonorgestrel; Measurement; Mortality; Northern Europe; Oral Contraceptives; Oral Contraceptives, Combined; Physiology; Population; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Research Report; Retrospective Studies; Studies; Thromboembolism; United Kingdom; Vascular Diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7500750     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91928-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  90 in total

1.  The third generation oral contraceptive controversy. The evidence shows they are less safe than second generation pills.

Authors:  P A O'Brien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

2.  Admission for and mortality from primary venous thromboembolism in women of fertile age in Denmark, 1977-95.

Authors:  L Mellemkjaer; H T Sørensen; L Dreyer; J Olsen; J H Olsen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

Review 3.  Benefits and risks of third-generation oral contraceptives.

Authors:  E S Leblanc; A Laws
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  DoH seems to have underestimated incidence of venous thromboembolism in users of combined oral contraceptives.

Authors:  R A Lawrenson; A Whalley; E Simpson; R D Farmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

5.  Incidence of venous thromboembolism in users of combined oral contraceptives. Methods for identifying cases and estimating person time at risk must be detailed.

Authors:  H Jick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-01

6.  Pitfalls of pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  R Farmer; T Williams; A Nightingale
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-25

7.  Evaluating primary care groups.

Authors:  S Gillam; A Coulter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Pitfalls of pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  D C Skegg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-11

9.  Third generation oral contraceptives.

Authors:  D C Skegg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-22

10.  Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Kemmeren; A Algra; D E Grobbee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.