Literature DB >> 7499116

Pharmacology, relative bioavailability, and toxicity of three different oral cyclophosphamide preparations in a randomized, cross-over study.

D J Stewart1, L R Morgan, S Verma, J A Maroun, M Thibault.   

Abstract

Thirty-six patients were entered on this study to determine the pharmacology, bioavailability, and toxicity of three different oral formulations of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Endoxan, and an investigational direct compression tablet). Patients were randomized with respect to the order in which they received the different oral cyclophosphamide preparations, and received each one for two weeks followed by a two week washout period. Concurrent chemotherapy was allowed provided it remained constant across all 3 courses of cyclophosphamide. Plasma concentrations of cyclophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard were measured by gas chromatography with electron capture detection. Peak plasma cyclophosphamide concentrations and times to peak plasma cyclophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard preparations were significantly greater for Endoxan than for Cytoxan and the investigational direct compression tablet. Drug area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), bioavailability, and plasma elimination half-life could not be reliably calculated for Endoxan but were similar for Cytoxan and the investigational formulation. Based on AUC comparisons, bioavailability of parent compound (relative to an oral cyclophosphamide solution) was 85% for Cytoxan and 69% for the investigational formulation. This difference was not significant. There were no significant differences between the 3 formulations with respect to any individual type of toxicity, although the investigational formulation tended to be associated with somewhat less overall toxicity (p = 0.08).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7499116     DOI: 10.1007/bf02614228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  L B Grochow; M Colvin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Difference in bioactivity between two preparations of cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  I C Shaw; L K Earl; M N Mruzek; P G Harper; A E McClean; R L Souhami
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-03-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Electron-capture--gas chromatographic analysis of ifosfamide in human plasma and urine.

Authors:  M R Holdiness; L R Morgan
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1983-07-08

4.  Plasma pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and its cytotoxic metabolites after intravenous versus oral administration in a randomized, crossover trial.

Authors:  R F Struck; D S Alberts; K Horne; J G Phillips; Y M Peng; D J Roe
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Pharmacokinetics of high-dose cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  P M Wilkinson; P A O'Neill; N Thatcher; S B Lucas
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and clinical effects of an oral preparation of etoposide.

Authors:  D J Stewart; D Nundy; J A Maroun; L Tetreault; J Prior
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-03

7.  Bioavailability and pharmacology of oral idarubicin.

Authors:  D J Stewart; D Grewaal; R M Green; S Verma; J A Maroun; D Redmond; L Robillard; S Gupta
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Role of carnitine in cancer chemotherapy-induced multiple organ toxicity.

Authors:  Mohamed M Sayed-Ahmed
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.330

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.