Literature DB >> 7498997

Evaluation of the technique used by health-care workers for taking blood pressure.

I Villegas1, I C Arias, A Botero, A Escobar.   

Abstract

The precise guidelines recommended by the American Heart Association for blood pressure measurement are commonly overlooked by health-care workers, who generally take blood pressure in an arbitrary way. To validate this observation we designed a descriptive and observational study to be carried out in a major hospital. One hundred and seventy-two health-care workers divided into four groups (63 general practitioners, 25 clinical and 25 surgical specialists, and 59 nurses) were evaluated in a two-part test. In the first part (practical), the examinee had to follow all the steps recommended by the American Heart Association to get a passing score. In the second part (theoretical, which came second to avoid influencing the practical), the examinee had to answer correctly 7 of 10 questions based on the American Heart Association's guidelines to obtain a passing score. The highest accepted variation in systolic and diastolic pressures between examinee and observer was +/- 4 mm Hg. None of the examinees followed the American Heart Association's recommendations. Sixty-three percent of systolic and 53% of diastolic readings were out of range. Surgical specialists obtained the best practical results (48% systolic and 64% diastolic within range), and nurses obtained the lowest values (29% and 39%, respectively; P = .03 versus surgical specialists). These two groups showed deficiencies in the theoretical test (nurses, 10% correct answers and surgical specialists, 16%). Clinical specialists obtained the best results on the theoretical test (60% correct; P < .05 versus the other groups) but were deficient in the practical test (32% systolic and 60% diastolic within range).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7498997     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.26.6.1204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  17 in total

1.  Knowledge of accurate blood pressure measurement procedures in chiropractic students.

Authors:  Angela M Crosley; James R La Rose
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2013-06-27

2.  Do physicians measure patients' blood pressure, and are those measurements reliable?

Authors:  Şükrü Ulusoy; Gülsüm Özkan; Beyhan Güvercin; Yeliz Sökmen; Yunus Erdem
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Sustained blood pressure control following discontinuation of a pharmacist intervention.

Authors:  Danielle M Wentzlaff; Barry L Carter; Gail Ardery; Carrie L Franciscus; William R Doucette; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Kurt A Rosenkrans; Lucinda M Buys
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Deterioration of blood pressure control after discontinuation of a physician-pharmacist collaborative intervention.

Authors:  Barry L Carter; William R Doucette; Carrie L Franciscus; Gail Ardery; Karen M Kluesner; Elizabeth A Chrischilles
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 5.  Principles and techniques of blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Gbenga Ogedegbe; Thomas Pickering
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.213

6.  Screening for hypertension annually compared with current practice.

Authors:  Gregory M Garrison; Sara Oberhelman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Similar blood pressure values across racial and economic groups: baseline data from a group randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Barry L Carter; Christopher S Coffey; Liz Uribe; Paul A James; Brent M Egan; Gail Ardery; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Dixie Ecklund; Mark Vander Weg; Thomas Vaughn
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  Diagnosing hypertension: Evidence supporting the 2015 recommendations of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program.

Authors:  Mark Gelfer; Martin Dawes; Janusz Kaczorowski; Raj Padwal; Lyne Cloutier
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Choosing the optimal method of blood pressure measurement for limited-resource rural communities in the "Community Health Assessment Program-Philippines".

Authors:  Dale Guenter; Ricardo Angeles; Janusz Kaczorowski; Gina Agarwal; Fortunato L Cristobal; Rosemarie Arciaga; John F Smith; Pattapong Kessomboon; Faical Jarraya; Rodelin Agbulos; Floro Dave Arnuco; Jerome Barrera; Susan Dimitry; Elgie Gregorio; Servando Halili; Norvie T Jalani; Nusaraporn Kessomboon; Maita Ladeza; Lisa Dolovich
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  A cluster randomized trial to evaluate physician/pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.

Authors:  Barry L Carter; George R Bergus; Jeffrey D Dawson; Karen B Farris; William R Doucette; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Arthur J Hartz
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.