BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts via cystenterostomy has been recognized as a successful treatment option in carefully selected patients. Pancreatic transpapillary stenting as an alternative treatment option in patients with pancreatic pseudocysts directly communicating with the main duct has received little consideration. The aim of the current study was to assess the safety and utility of transpapillary pancreatic endoprosthesis in the treatment of communicating pseudocysts. METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent placement of 33 transpapillary endoprostheses for the treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. All pseudocysts communicated with the main pancreatic duct and ranged in size from 3 to 9 cm (mean 6 cm). Eight patients had associated pancreatic duct strictures. RESULTS: Stent placement was successful in all cases: 13 directly into the pseudocyst, 8 beyond the stricture but not into the pseudocyst. Initial resolution of pseudocysts was seen in 17 patients, with 16 patients free of pseudocyst recurrence at mean follow-up of 37 months. All patients with associated strictures were treated successfully. Factors predictive of success included presence of strictures, size of pseudocyst greater than or equal to 6 cm, location in the body of the pancreas, and duration of pseudocyst less than 6 months. Complications included one episode of mild pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts with ductal communication by transpapillary pancreatic duct stenting is a safe, effective modality and should be considered a first line therapy.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts via cystenterostomy has been recognized as a successful treatment option in carefully selected patients. Pancreatic transpapillary stenting as an alternative treatment option in patients with pancreatic pseudocysts directly communicating with the main duct has received little consideration. The aim of the current study was to assess the safety and utility of transpapillary pancreatic endoprosthesis in the treatment of communicating pseudocysts. METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent placement of 33 transpapillary endoprostheses for the treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. All pseudocysts communicated with the main pancreatic duct and ranged in size from 3 to 9 cm (mean 6 cm). Eight patients had associated pancreatic duct strictures. RESULTS: Stent placement was successful in all cases: 13 directly into the pseudocyst, 8 beyond the stricture but not into the pseudocyst. Initial resolution of pseudocysts was seen in 17 patients, with 16 patients free of pseudocyst recurrence at mean follow-up of 37 months. All patients with associated strictures were treated successfully. Factors predictive of success included presence of strictures, size of pseudocyst greater than or equal to 6 cm, location in the body of the pancreas, and duration of pseudocyst less than 6 months. Complications included one episode of mild pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts with ductal communication by transpapillary pancreatic duct stenting is a safe, effective modality and should be considered a first line therapy.