BACKGROUND & AIMS: Because ursodeoxycholate has been shown to act as a tumor-suppressive agent in the colon, the absorption and metabolism of its sulfate conjugates were examined in rats to show that sulfation would facilitate the site-specific delivery of ursodeoxycholate to the colon. METHODS: Bile acids were measured in intestinal contents, feces, urine, plasma, and liver tissue after oral administration of ursodeoxycholate and its C-3, C-7, and C-3,7 sulfate derivatives. RESULTS: Ursodeoxycholate was found in the jejunum after administration of all bile acids, but the mass was greatest for ursodeoxycholic acid administration. In the colon, lithocholic acid, normally found in negligible amounts, became the major bile acid after ursodeoxycholate administration. In contrast, reductions in mass and proportions of lithocholate and deoxycholate occurred after administering the C-7 sulfates. The fecal lithocholate/deoxycholate ratio, a risk marker for colon cancer, increased markedly after administration of ursodeoxycholate and its C-3 sulfate, but did not change after administering the C-7 sulfates. Unlike ursodeoxycholate or its C-3 sulfate, which increased liver concentrations of lithocholate and ursodeoxycholate, the C-7 sulfates had the opposite effect, which was consistent with poor absorption. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfation of ursodeoxycholate, specifically at the C-7 position, protects the molecule from bacterial degradation and inhibits its intestinal absorption, thereby facilitating delivery to the colon.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Because ursodeoxycholate has been shown to act as a tumor-suppressive agent in the colon, the absorption and metabolism of its sulfate conjugates were examined in rats to show that sulfation would facilitate the site-specific delivery of ursodeoxycholate to the colon. METHODS:Bile acids were measured in intestinal contents, feces, urine, plasma, and liver tissue after oral administration of ursodeoxycholate and its C-3, C-7, and C-3,7 sulfate derivatives. RESULTS:Ursodeoxycholate was found in the jejunum after administration of all bile acids, but the mass was greatest for ursodeoxycholic acid administration. In the colon, lithocholic acid, normally found in negligible amounts, became the major bile acid after ursodeoxycholate administration. In contrast, reductions in mass and proportions of lithocholate and deoxycholate occurred after administering the C-7 sulfates. The fecal lithocholate/deoxycholate ratio, a risk marker for colon cancer, increased markedly after administration of ursodeoxycholate and its C-3sulfate, but did not change after administering the C-7 sulfates. Unlike ursodeoxycholate or its C-3sulfate, which increased liver concentrations of lithocholate and ursodeoxycholate, the C-7 sulfates had the opposite effect, which was consistent with poor absorption. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfation of ursodeoxycholate, specifically at the C-7 position, protects the molecule from bacterial degradation and inhibits its intestinal absorption, thereby facilitating delivery to the colon.
Authors: Kristen L Stoltz; Raymond Erickson; Christopher Staley; Alexa R Weingarden; Erin Romens; Clifford J Steer; Alexander Khoruts; Michael J Sadowsky; Peter I Dosa Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: John E Eaton; Marina G Silveira; Darrell S Pardi; Emmanouil Sinakos; Kris V Kowdley; Velimir A C Luketic; M Edwyn Harrison; Timothy McCashland; Alex S Befeler; Denise Harnois; Roberta Jorgensen; Jan Petz; Keith D Lindor Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Carlos Felipe Bernardes-Silva; Adérson O M C Damião; Aytan M Sipahi; Francisco R M Laurindo; Kiyoshi Iriya; Fabio P Lopasso; Carlos A Buchpiguel; Maria Laura L Lordello; Carmem L O Agostinho; Antonio A Laudanna Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Duarte M S Ferreira; Marta B Afonso; Pedro M Rodrigues; André L Simão; Diane M Pereira; Pedro M Borralho; Cecília M P Rodrigues; Rui E Castro Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 4.272