Literature DB >> 7497835

Extended resections are beneficial for patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer.

J R Izbicki1, S B Hosch, W T Knoefel, B Passlick, C Bloechle, C E Broelsch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Locally advanced colorectal cancer often requires extended resection to radically remove all tumor. This is the only chance for cure in these patients, but a higher complication rate would be expected. To evaluate the overall benefit for the patient, this study assesses morbidity and mortality as well as long-term survival of patients who underwent extended resection for a T3-T4 carcinoma.
METHODS: Two hundred twenty patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the colorectum were included. One hundred fifty presented with a T3 and 70 with a T4 tumor. Eighty-three patients underwent extended resection. In 38 patients extended en bloc resection was performed because of inflammatory adherence mimicking infiltration. Thirty-three patients who underwent extended resections were over 70 years of age. There were no significant differences between the groups that underwent extended or nonextended resections in age, sex, stage, or grading.
RESULTS: pT4 lesions were significantly more frequent in the extended resection group than in the nonextended resection group. Mean survival was 44 months after extended resections and 45 months after nonextended resections. In the extended resection group there was no significant difference in mean survival between pT3 and pT4 stage patients within 46 and 38 months, respectively. In patients who underwent nonextended resections, however, there was a significant difference in mean survival within 48 months for pT3 and 28 for pT4 patients (P < 0.05). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were comparable between the extended resection group and the non-extended resection group. The presence of residual tumor influenced prognosis of patients significantly; R0 resections fared significantly better than patients who underwent R1 or R2 resections (55 and 51 to 14/12 and 23/8 months) (P < 0.01). Nodal stage and International Union Against Cancer stage were also significant determinants of prognosis. After extended resections mean survival morbidity and 30-day mortality in patients more than 70 years was similar to those less than 70 years.
CONCLUSION: Because extended resections can achieve comparable results in locally more advanced colorectal cancer as nonextended resections in less advanced cancer, an aggressive surgical approach is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7497835     DOI: 10.1007/bf02049148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  13 in total

1.  Outcome of surgical management of the bladder in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Yun-fei Cao; Li-sheng Chen; Sen Zhang; Zong-jiang Tang; Jun-lin Liang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Clinicopathologic variables affecting survival of distal colorectal cancer patients with macroscopic invasion into the adjacent organs.

Authors:  T Nakamura; H Yoshioka; M Ohno; T Kuniyasu; Y Tabuchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  [Clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas].

Authors:  S E Baldus
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Modified supralevator pelvic exenteration for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with vaginal and uterine invasion.

Authors:  André Roncon Dias; Sérgio Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Analysis of the prognostic effectiveness of a multivisceral resection for locally advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sejin Park; Yun Sik Lee
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-28

6.  Predictors of multivisceral resection in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anand Govindarajan; Novlette Fraser; Vanessa Cranford; Debrah Wirtzfeld; Steve Gallinger; Calvin H L Law; Andrew J Smith; Anna R Gagliardi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Sphincter-preserving R0 total mesorectal excision with resection of internal genitalia combined with pre- or postoperative chemoradiation for T4 rectal cancer in females.

Authors:  Bartlomiej Szynglarewicz; Rafal Matkowski; Piotr Kasprzak; Daniel Sydor; Jozef Forgacz; Marek Pudelko; Jan Kornafel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Clinical review: surgical management of locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D Courtney; F McDermott; A Heeney; D C Winter
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Results after multivisceral resections of locally advanced colorectal cancers: an analysis on clinical and pathological t4 tumors.

Authors:  Cem Gezen; Metin Kement; Yunus E Altuntas; Nuri Okkabaz; Mesut Seker; Selahattin Vural; Mahmut Gumus; Mustafa Oncel
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Surgical outcomes for colon and rectal cancer over a decade: results from a consecutive monocentric experience in 902 unselected patients.

Authors:  Bruno Andreoni; Antonio Chiappa; Emilio Bertani; Massimo Bellomi; Roberto Orecchia; Mariagiulia Zampino; Nicola Fazio; Marco Venturino; Franco Orsi; Angelica Sonzogni; Ugo Pace; Lorenzo Monfardini
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.