Literature DB >> 7497486

A single center randomized trial assessing use of a vascular hemostasis device vs. conventional manual compression following PTCA: what are the potential resource savings?

P M Slaughter1, R Chetty, V F Flintoft, S Lewis, K Sykora, D M Beattie, L Schwartz.   

Abstract

We undertook a randomized controlled trial comparing VasoSeal, a collagen vascular hemostasis device (VHD), with manual compression to assess its role and potential cost savings in the PTCA population. Of 460 patients, 359 were excluded due to clinical instability (30%), groin problems (18%), suboptimal PTCA result (15%), and other reasons (37%). The remaining 101 patients were randomized to either VHD (51) or manual compression (50). Hemostasis time, time to ambulation, duration of hospital stay, and nursing time and intensity were significantly reduced in the VHD group. There were no major groin complications in either treatment arm but there was a trend toward more minor groin complications in the VHD patients. The application of VasoSeal reduced resource use in this randomized study and may translate into significant cost reductions in the general coronary angioplasty population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7497486     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1810340106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn        ISSN: 0098-6569


  6 in total

1.  Postinterventional percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites using the Clo-Sur PAD device: initial findings.

Authors:  Jörn Oliver Balzer; Wolfram Schwarz; Axel Thalhammer; Katrin Eichler; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Vascular closure device failure in contemporary practice.

Authors:  Venkatesan D Vidi; Michael E Matheny; Usha S Govindarajulu; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Susan L Robbins; Vikram V Agarwal; Sripal Bangalore; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Vascular closure device failure: frequency and implications: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Nipun Arora; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  Vascular Closure Devices versus Manual Compression in Cardiac Interventional Procedures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Naidong Pang; Jia Gao; Binghang Zhang; Min Guo; Nan Zhang; Meng Sun; Rui Wang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 5.  Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials on the Safety of Vascular Closure Devices for Femoral Arterial Puncture Site Haemostasis.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Junjie Zou; Hao Ma; Yuanyong Jiao; Hongyu Yang; Xiwei Zhang; Yi Miao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Early decision-analytic modeling - a case study on vascular closure devices.

Authors:  Alina Brandes; Moritz F Sinner; Stefan Kääb; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.