OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of surgical complications related to reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments. DESIGN: A review of all laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures done between August 1990 and January 1994 in which disposable laparoscopic instruments were reused. SETTING: Department of general surgery in a 461-bed teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent 874 laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in which disposable laparoscopic instruments were reused according to validated reprocessing protocols. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of superficial and deep wound infections and complications related to instrument malfunction. RESULTS: The combined rate for deep and superficial infections was 1.8%. No complications related to a disposable instrument malfunction were found. CONCLUSION: Disposable laparoscopic instruments may be safely reused under carefully monitored conditions and with strict guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of surgical complications related to reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments. DESIGN: A review of all laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures done between August 1990 and January 1994 in which disposable laparoscopic instruments were reused. SETTING: Department of general surgery in a 461-bed teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent 874 laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in which disposable laparoscopic instruments were reused according to validated reprocessing protocols. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of superficial and deep wound infections and complications related to instrument malfunction. RESULTS: The combined rate for deep and superficial infections was 1.8%. No complications related to a disposable instrument malfunction were found. CONCLUSION: Disposable laparoscopic instruments may be safely reused under carefully monitored conditions and with strict guidelines.