Literature DB >> 7497140

Cost comparison of different methods of screening for cystic fibrosis.

J K Morris1, P M Oppenheimer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs of several proposed methods of screening for cystic fibrosis.
SETTING: England and Wales.
METHODS: The costs of screening carried out at hospital antenatal clinics, general practitioner (GP) antenatal consultations, GP surgeries, and at work were estimated using data from demonstration projects. Couple screening, stepwise screening, and screening of individuals were considered.
RESULTS: Couple screening at antenatal hospital clinics was the least expensive per carrier couple detected, amounting to 35,700 pounds (142,900 pounds for each potential cystic fibrosis fetus detected). The costs of the reagents (25 pounds per test) accounted for over 60% of this total.
CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal screening, in addition to being the most cost effective method of screening, is also medically the screening method of choice as it provides information at the latest time when effective preventive action can be taken and at a time when all people to be screened are likely to be accessible. If the costs of the reagents could be reduced to 5 pounds (still higher than the costs of most diagnostic reagents) the cost for each pregnant carrier couple offered screening would be reduced by 50% to about 18,000 pounds, and the cost of offering screening to 684,000 pregnant couples in England and Wales would be about 9 1/2 m instead of 19 m pounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7497140     DOI: 10.1177/096914139500200107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  4 in total

1.  Costs, effects, and savings of screening for cystic fibrosis gene carriers.

Authors:  M F Wildhagen; H B Hilderink; J G Verzijl; J B Verheij; L Kooij; T Tijmstra; L P ten Kate; J D Habbema
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Cost effectiveness of antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Realistic cost must be established for genetic counselling in two step screening.

Authors:  D J Brock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-06

3.  Cost effectiveness of antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Couple screening should be preferred for medical reasons.

Authors:  J Morris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-06

4.  Cost-effectiveness of the CFTR gene-sequencing test for asymptomatic carriers in the Colombian population

Authors:  Ernesto Andrade; Jorge Díaz
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 0.935

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.