Literature DB >> 7496836

Proliferative indices and oncoprotein expression in benign and malignant breast biopsies.

S T Brower1, P I Tartter, S Ahmed, C M Brusco, K Bossolt, C Hayden, I Bleiweiss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognostic factors are used routinely in the management of breast cancer. However, their potential for identifying precursor malignant lesions has not been assessed.
METHODS: We have examined 285 breast biopsy specimens (140 benign, 145 malignant) for DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction, Ki-67 nuclear antigen proliferative indices, and HER-2/neu and epidermal growth factor receptor oncoproteins.
RESULTS: When proliferative indices were compared between the benign and malignant groups, differences were noted for DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction, and cell cycling index (p < 0.0005). When the benign nonproliferative specimens were compared with the atypical/proliferative benign specimens, proliferative indices failed to show any differences. When the specific subset of proliferative/atypical benign breast tissue was compared with the malignant specimens, DNA index, S-phase fraction, and cell cycling index showed significant differences. The mean for epidermal growth factor receptor was greater in the non-proliferative group but not statistically significant (p < 0.1). HER-2/neu oncoprotein failed to show any differences between the benign and malignant groups. Within the atypical benign group, Ki-67 correlated strongly with S-phase fraction and HER-2/neu (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that proliferative indices can differentiate between benign and malignant breast tissues but not among specific subgroups. In addition, epidermal growth factor may differentiate between nonproliferative and proliferative/atypical benign biopsy results. Oncoprotein determination, ploidy, and DNA proliferative indices may be useful in defining malignant and benign breast disease but are not useful in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast disease with an increased likelihood for malignant transformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7496836     DOI: 10.1007/bf02306374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  32 in total

1.  Biological grading of breast cancer using antibodies to proliferating cells and other markers.

Authors:  S S Bacus; R Goldschmidt; D Chin; G Moran; D Weinberg; J W Bacus
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Neu-protein overexpression in breast cancer. Association with comedo-type ductal carcinoma in situ and limited prognostic value in stage II breast cancer.

Authors:  M J van de Vijver; J L Peterse; W J Mooi; P Wisman; J Lomans; O Dalesio; R Nusse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  New biologic prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  G M Clark; W L McGuire
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation.

Authors:  J Gerdes; U Schwab; H Lemke; H Stein
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1983-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D J Slamon; W Godolphin; L A Jones; J A Holt; S G Wong; D E Keith; W J Levin; S G Stuart; J Udove; A Ullrich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Anatomic markers of human premalignancy and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  D L Page; W D Dupont
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  HER-2/neu oncogene protein and prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  A K Tandon; G M Clark; G C Chamness; A Ullrich; W L McGuire
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prognostic significance of DNA-ploidy in a series of 690 primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  H Beerman; P M Kluin; J Hermans; C J van de Velde; C J Cornelisse
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  A prospective study of the development of breast cancer in 16,692 women with benign breast disease.

Authors:  C L Carter; D K Corle; M S Micozzi; A Schatzkin; P R Taylor
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease.

Authors:  W D Dupont; D L Page
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Ki-67 expression in sclerosing adenosis and adjacent normal breast terminal ductal lobular units: a nested case-control study from the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort.

Authors:  Aziza Nassar; Tanya L Hoskin; Melody L Stallings-Mann; Amy C Degnim; Derek C Radisky; Marlene H Frost; Robert A Vierkant; Lynn C Hartmann; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  DNA ploidy analyses in 218 consecutive Pakistani breast cancer patients: does it add anything?

Authors:  E Khan; Z Mapara; S Khan; N Arshad; T Siddiqui; S Pervez
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Cancer biomarker HER-2/neu in breast cancer in Indian women.

Authors:  Rajeev Singhai; Amit V Patil; Vinayak W Patil
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2011-03-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.