Literature DB >> 7496708

A phantom based method for deriving typical patient doses from measurements of dose-area product on populations of patients.

C L Chapple1, D A Broadhead, K Faulkner.   

Abstract

One of the chief sources of uncertainty in the comparison of patient dosimetry data is the influence of patient size on dose. Dose has been shown to relate closely to the equivalent diameter of the patient. This concept has been used to derive a prospective, phantom based method for determining size correction factors for measurements of dose-area product. The derivation of the size correction factor has been demonstrated mathematically, and the appropriate factor determined for a number of different X-ray sets. The use of phantom measurements enables the effect of patient size to be isolated from other factors influencing patient dose. The derived factors agree well with those determined retrospectively from patient dose survey data. Size correction factors have been applied to the results of a large scale patient dose survey, and this approach has been compared with the method of selecting patients according to their weight. For large samples of data, mean dose-area product values are independent of the analysis method used. The chief advantage of using size correction factors is that it allows all patient data to be included in a survey, whereas patient selection has been shown to exclude approximately half of all patients. Reduction of the size of the data set may lead to mean dose-area product values that are less reliable indicators of typical practice. The use of size correction factors will be of particular benefit in the analysis of paediatric dosimetry data, where a wide range of sizes exist, even within accepted age bands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7496708     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-814-1083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  9 in total

1.  Radiation dose in videofluoroscopic swallow studies.

Authors:  Ivan Zammit-Maempel; Claire-Louise Chapple; Paula Leslie
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for U.S. practice.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Deukwoo Kwon; Grant H Bonavia
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Radiation dose reduction in fluoroscopic procedures: left varicocele embolization as a model.

Authors:  Anthony G Verstandig; Bashar Shamieh; Vladimir Shraibman; David Raveh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Proposed achievable levels of dose and impact of dose-reduction systems for thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: an international, multicentric, retrospective study in 1096 patients.

Authors:  Adrien Guenego; Pascal J Mosimann; Vitor Mendes Pereira; Patrick Nicholson; Kevin Zuber; Jean Albert Lotterie; Tomas Dobrocky; David G Marcellus; Jean Marc Olivot; Michel Piotin; Jan Gralla; Robert Fahed; Max Wintermark; Jeremy J Heit; Christophe Cognard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Effective dose estimation for pediatric voiding cystourethrography using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology.

Authors:  Ryan Lee; Karen E Thomas; Bairbre L Connolly; Michelle Falkiner; Christopher L Gordon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-02-25

6.  Foetal radiation dose and risk from diagnostic radiology procedures: a multinational study.

Authors:  Ernest K Osei; Johnson Darko
Journal:  ISRN Radiol       Date:  2012-09-25

7.  Safety and Effectiveness of Neuro-thrombectomy on Single compared to Biplane Angiography Systems.

Authors:  Adrien Guenego; Pascal J Mosimann; Max Wintermark; Jeremy J Heit; Kevin Zuber; Tomas Dobrocky; Jean Albert Lotterie; Patrick Nicholson; David G Marcellus; Jean Marc Olivot; Nestor Gonzalez; Raphaël Blanc; Vitor Mendes Pereira; Jan Gralla; Johannes Kaesmacher; Robert Fahed; Michel Piotin; Christophe Cognard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Reference phantom selection in pediatric computed tomography using data from a large, multicenter registry.

Authors:  Philip W Chu; Sophronia Yu; Yifei Wang; J Anthony Seibert; Luisa F Cervantes; Nima Kasraie; Cameron A Chu; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-12-06

9.  Radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: initial results from the establishment of a multi-centre diagnostic reference level in Queensland public hospitals.

Authors:  James A Crowhurst; Mark Whitby; David Thiele; Toni Halligan; Adam Westerink; Suzanne Crown; Jillian Milne
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.