Literature DB >> 7494997

Diagnosis of liver flukes in cows--a comparison of the findings in the liver, in the feces, and in the bile.

U Braun1, R Wolfensberger, H Hertzberg.   

Abstract

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided cholecystocentesis and aspiration of bile were attempted in 176 cows. These same procedures were performed in another 100 cows immediately after slaughter. The bile samples were examined microscopically for large and small liver fluke eggs. In addition, a fecal sample from each cow was examined for liver fluke eggs. The findings of both groups were summarized, and the results of the fecal and bile sample examinations were compared. In all cows the liver was examined for flukes, and the results were used as a reference. Of 41 cows in which adult flukes were found in the liver, 28 had F. hepatica eggs in fecal samples and 40 had F. hepatica eggs in bile samples. Of 204 cows in which no adult flukes were found in the liver, 23 had F. hepatica eggs in fecal samples and 27 had F. hepatica eggs in bile samples. The sensitivity of the determination of F. hepatica eggs in fecal and bile samples was 68 and 98%, respectively. The negative predictive values for fecal and bile examination were 93 and 99%, respectively. Of 49 cows in which adult flukes were observed in the liver, 13 had D. dendriticum eggs in fecal samples and 44 had D. dendriticum eggs in bile samples. Of 176 cows in which no adult flukes were found in the liver, 19 had D. dendriticum eggs in fecal samples and 49 had D. dendriticum eggs in bile samples. The sensitivity of the determination of D. dendriticum eggs in fecal and bile samples was 27 and 90%, respectively. The negative predictive values for fecal and bile examination were 81 and 96%, respectively. The results of this study indicate that the examination of bile is clearly a more reliable method of diagnosing liver fluke infections than microscopic examination of feces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7494997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd        ISSN: 0036-7281            Impact factor:   0.845


  5 in total

1.  The epidemiology of fasciolosis in ruminants in different geo-climatic regions of north India.

Authors:  Rajat Garg; C L Yadav; R R Kumar; P S Banerjee; Stuti Vatsya; Rajesh Godara
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Diagnostic imaging in sheep hepatic fascioliasis: ultrasound, computer tomography and magnetic resonance findings.

Authors:  M Gonzalo-Orden; L Millán; M Alvarez; S Sánchez-Campos; R Jiménez; J González-Gallego; M J Tuñón
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  A post-mortem study of bovine fasciolosis in the Mitidja (north center of Algeria): prevalence, risk factors, and comparison of diagnostic methods.

Authors:  Mylissa Chaouadi; Khaled Harhoura; Miriem Aissi; Houria Zait; Safia Zenia; Fadila Tazerouti
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 1.893

4.  Application of ultrasound-guided cholecystocentesis to the evaluation of the metabolite profiling in bile of dogs and cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Dierks; Chiuwa E Luk; Hong Cai; Jamus MacGuire; Maxine Fox; James Smalley; R Marc Fancher; Evan Janovitz; Kimberly Foster; Qin Sun
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2019-05-27

5.  Comparison of four commercially available ELISA kits for diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in Irish cattle.

Authors:  Maria Pia Munita; Rosemary Rea; Ana Maria Martinez-Ibeas; Noel Byrne; Aideen Kennedy; Mary Sekiya; Grace Mulcahy; Riona Sayers
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.741

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.