Literature DB >> 7494082

Is there a typical VDT patient? A demographic analysis.

C Salibello, E Nilsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of video display terminals (VDT) in the workplace is growing rapidly. Visual problems associated with computer use are increasing apace. Recognizing and addressing these needs are vital tasks for the optometric practitioner. This paper examines the demographics, prevalence of symptoms, and other work- and vision-related factors among VDT workers. Understanding the characteristics of a typical patient can aid in developing effective treatment protocols.
METHODS: Twenty-two optometrists collected data from 324 patients who work on VDT screens for a minimum of 2 hours per day. A questionnaire was used to collect the data. Along with reporting the patients' dry manifest refraction results, the survey instrument also included a self-report of experienced symptoms.
RESULTS: The prototypical patient, based on the total subject population, is a 38-year old, mildly myopic female who uses the computer screen about 5 hours per day. Average total VDT work experience is about 5 years. Most of the patients use full-color screens and sit between 21 and 22 inches away from the screen. A variety of visual symptoms is reported, with eyestrain (65 percent) and headaches (42 percent) being the most common complaints.
CONCLUSIONS: Between 75 percent (results of this study) and 88 percent (reported by NIOSH) of patients who use a VDT regularly are likely to be symptomatic. This study has helped to identify the "typical" VDT user and the symptoms this user is most likely to report. The next step is to develop a diagnostic and treatment protocol by which optometrists can prescribe for and potentially prevent these computer-related vision problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7494082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc        ISSN: 0003-0244


  9 in total

1.  Characteristics of spontaneous eyeblink activity during video display terminal use in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Nora Freudenthaler; Hartmut Neuf; Gregor Kadner; Torsten Schlote
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  A field intervention examining the impact of an office ergonomics training and a highly adjustable chair on visual symptoms in a public sector organization.

Authors:  Benjamin C Amick; Cammie Chaumont Menéndez; Lianna Bazzani; Michelle Robertson; Kelly DeRango; Ted Rooney; Anne Moore
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Effect of Various Eye Exercise Techniques along with Pranayama on Visual Reaction Time: A Case Control Study.

Authors:  Nitin B Gosewade; Vinod S Shende; Shriniwas J Kashalikar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

4.  Evaluation of the Factors which Contribute to the Ocular Complaints in Computer Users.

Authors:  Smita Agarwal; Dishanter Goel; Anshu Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-12-24

5.  Computer Vision Syndrome and Associated Factors Among Secretaries Working in Ministry Offices in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mahlet Getachew Lemma; Kidanemariam G/Michael Beyene; Mesafint Abeje Tiruneh
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2020-12-03

6.  Marked reduction and distinct patterns of eye blinking in patients with moderately dry eyes during video display terminal use.

Authors:  Torsten Schlote; Gregor Kadner; Nora Freudenthaler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Factors Associated with Visual Fatigue from Curved Monitor Use: A Prospective Study of Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Haeng Jin Lee; Seong-Joon Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Impact of Visual Guided Order Picking on Ocular Comfort, Ocular Surface and Tear Function.

Authors:  Angelika Klein-Theyer; Jutta Horwath-Winter; Dieter Franz Rabensteiner; Gerold Schwantzer; Georg Wultsch; Haleh Aminfar; Andrea Heidinger; Ingrid Boldin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of the use of digital devices on eyes during the lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ugam Usgaonkar; Simran Rajan Shet Parkar; Aksha Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.848

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.