Literature DB >> 7493539

HPR perimetry and Humphrey perimetry in glaucomatous children.

M Marraffa1, V Pucci, G Marchini, S Morselli, R Bellucci, L Bonomi.   

Abstract

Fifteen children aged less than 11 years, affected by congenital glaucoma, underwent visual field testing using two different methods: conventional computerized perimetry (24-2 Humphrey program) and High Pass Resolution perimetry (Ring test). The aim of the study was to discover which of the two perimetric techniques was more suitable for younger patient. Results showed that HPR perimetry is more suitable to children. Reasons include the short duration of the test (5 min), and the appearance like a pleasant game to 80% of the subjects tested. In addition it proved to be better than Humphrey test because of the minimal possibilities of memorisation with a reproducibility factor of 68% in our sample and because of the reliable results and satisfactory evaluation in 76% of the eyes examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7493539     DOI: 10.1007/bf01203713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  4 in total

1.  Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; P H House
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 2.  High-pass resolution perimetry. A clinical review.

Authors:  L Frisén
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Properties of high-pass resolution perimetry targets.

Authors:  L Frisén; F Nikolajeff
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1993-06

4.  Normative values for visual fields in 4- to 12-year-old children using kinetic perimetry.

Authors:  M Wilson; G Quinn; V Dobson; M Breton
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.402

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; John Brookes; Maria Papadopoulos; Peng Tee Khaw; Ananth C Viswanathan; David Garway-Heath; Mario Cortina-Borja; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Feasibility and outcome of automated kinetic perimetry in children.

Authors:  Stephanie Wilscher; Bettina Wabbels; Birgit Lorenz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  The effect of parental factors in children with large cup-to-disc ratios.

Authors:  Hae-Young Lopilly Park; Min Ji Ha; Sun Young Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): Feasibility, Reliability and Repeatability of Perimetry in Children.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.