Literature DB >> 7491308

Effects of electroporation on transmembrane potential induced by defibrillation shocks.

W Krassowska1.   

Abstract

This study uses a one-dimensional model of cardiac strand to investigate the effects of electroporation on transmembrane potential (Vm) induced by defibrillation shocks. The strand is stimulated at the ends by extracellular electrodes. Its membrane, when exposed to large Vm, increases its conductance in a manner consistent with reversible electrical breakdown. Numerical simulations indicate that Vm increases proportionally to the shock strength only until the ends of the strand electroporate. Beyond this point, further increases in shock strength result in only a minor change in Vm. This arrest in the growth of Vm is caused by pores that develop in the cells immediately adjacent to the electrodes and that shunt part of the stimulating current directly into intracellular space. Consequently, only a fraction of the delivered current, Icr, gives rise to Vm; the current in excess of Icr divides itself proportionally between intra- and extracellular space and does not contribute to macroscopic Vm. Thus, electroporation has a beneficial effect: the formation of pores prevents the development of an excessively high Vm and limits the damage to the tissue. In contrast, electroporation does not affect the "sawtooth" component of Vm that reflects polarization of individual cells by electric field. These results indicate that electroporation does not impair the ability of the shock to reach the distant myocardium and may actually aid defibrillation by reducing nonuniformity of electrical conditions between regions close to the electrodes and in the bulk of tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7491308     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb06986.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  11 in total

1.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell. II. Effects Of ionic concentrations.

Authors:  K A DeBruin; W Krassowska
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell. I. Effects Of field strength and rest potential.

Authors:  K A DeBruin; W Krassowska
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Entrainment by an extracellular AC stimulus in a computational model of cardiac tissue.

Authors:  J M Meunier; N A Trayanova; R A Gray
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-10

4.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Membrane electroporation theories: a review.

Authors:  C Chen; S W Smye; M P Robinson; J A Evans
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  QT dispersion significantly increases after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  Serkan Topaloglu; Dursun Aras; Onur Sahin; Kumral Ergun; Bulent Deveci; Ozcan Ozdemir; Ozcan Ozeke; Ali Yildiz; Omer Alyan; Ahmet Duran Demir; Mustafa Soylu; Halil Lutfi Kisacik; Sule Korkmaz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  Spatial distribution and extent of electroporation by strong internal shock in intact structurally normal and chronically infarcted rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Seok C Kim; Amit Vasanji; Igor R Efimov; Yuanna Cheng
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-05-09

Review 8.  The strength-interval curve in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  Sunil M Kandel; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  The role of Purkinje-myocardial coupling during ventricular arrhythmia: a modeling study.

Authors:  Elham Behradfar; Anders Nygren; Edward J Vigmond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efficient simulation of cardiac electrical propagation using high order finite elements.

Authors:  Christopher J Arthurs; Martin J Bishop; David Kay
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.