Literature DB >> 7490913

Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in surgical pathology: review of a 1-year experience with 24,880 cases at Mayo Clinic Rochester.

J A Ferreiro1, J L Myers, D G Bostwick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of frozen section examination for routine diagnostic use in surgical pathology.
DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the experience with frozen sections at Mayo Clinic Rochester during calendar year 1993.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results in 24,880 cases (97,914 frozen section slides) processed during 1993 were compared with findings on permanent sections, and types of errors detected were classified into one of three quality assurance categories.
RESULTS: The overall rate of frozen section accuracy was 97.8%. Of the 2.2% of surgical pathology reports that needed revision, 1.6% were unavoidable tissue sampling errors, 0.5% were errors that reflected change in degree of abnormality, and only 0.1% were clinically significant errors that may have affected patient management.
CONCLUSION: Frozen section diagnosis is accurate for processing a high volume of surgical pathology cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7490913     DOI: 10.4065/70.12.1137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  24 in total

1.  Intraoperative consultation (IOC) in mucosal lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  Bruce M Wenig
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2008-07-15

2.  Intra-operative frozen section consultation: concepts, applications and limitations.

Authors:  Hasnan Jaafar
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2006-01

3.  Intraoperative pathology consultation: error, cause and impact.

Authors:  Etienne Mahe; Shamim Ara; Mona Bishara; Annie Kurian; Syeda Tauqir; Nafisa Ursani; Pooja Vasudev; Tariq Aziz; Cathy Ross; Alice Lytwyn
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Malignant eyelid tumors: Are intra-operative rapid frozen section and permanent section diagnoses of surgical margins concordant?

Authors:  Swathi Kaliki; Sasi Pyda; Nupur Goel; Tarjani Vivek Dave; Milind N Naik; Dilip K Mishra
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Internal quality assurance activities of a surgical pathology department in an Australian teaching hospital.

Authors:  I M Zardawi; G Bennett; S Jain; M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Length of negative resection margin does not affect local recurrence and survival in the patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chang Min Lee; Ye Seob Jee; Ju-Hee Lee; Sang-Yong Son; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Intramuscular myxoma: clinical and surgical observation notes on eleven cases.

Authors:  Yahya Baltu; Şefik Murat Arikan; Utku Can Dölen; Hakan Uzun; Banu İnce Alkan; Orhan Aydın
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Systematic Review of the Use of Telepathology During Intraoperative Consultation.

Authors:  Robin L Dietz; Douglas J Hartman; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 9.  Systematic review of the predictors of positive margins in gastric cancer surgery and the effect on survival.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Raziee; Roberta Cardoso; Rajini Seevaratnam; Alyson Mahar; Lucy Helyer; Calvin Law; Natalie Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Risk factor analysis for involvement of resection margins in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer: an Italian multicenter study.

Authors:  Massimiliano Bissolati; Matteo Desio; Fausto Rosa; Stefano Rausei; Daniele Marrelli; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Giovanni De Manzoni; Damiano Chiari; Giovanni Guarneri; Fabio Pacelli; Lorenzo De Franco; Sarah Molfino; Chiara Cipollari; Elena Orsenigo
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.