Literature DB >> 7490892

Ureteroscopic removal of mid and proximal ureteral calculi.

M Erhard1, J Salwen, D H Bagley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is considered standard therapy for most renal calculi as well as more than 80% of all upper urinary tract stones. The development of flexible and small diameter rigid ureteroscopes, and the increased availability of laser lithotriptors have made endoscopic treatment of ureteral calculi more successful and safe. This report represents our contemporary series of 80 single mid and proximal ureteral calculi treated endoscopically.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 78 patients underwent 80 primary endoscopic procedures with 3 auxiliary ESWL and 2 endoscopic re-treatments for 41 mid and 39 proximal ureteral calculi. Lithotripsy was performed for 55 of the 80 stones.
RESULTS: Of the 80 stones 75 (94%) successfully cleared 1 month after 1 endoscopic procedure. The success rate was 38 of 39 (97%) for proximal calculi and 37 of 41 (90%) for mid ureteral stones. With a single re-treatment overall success increased to 96%. If adjuvant ESWL was added, 100% success was attained. Currently all procedures are performed on an outpatient basis. Morbidity is low and there have been no major complications, such as stricture, renal loss or death.
CONCLUSIONS: Our series demonstrates the high success rate that can be achieved with ureteroscopic removal of mid and proximal ureteral calculi. Thus, ureteroscopic treatment should be considered a treatment of choice for upper ureteral calculi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 7490892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  The management of ureteric calculi without extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  G C O'Toole; S M Khan; D G Kelly; D M Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Stone necklace of urinary tract presenting as renal failure: one stage management.

Authors:  L N Dorairajan; M Talwar; A K Hemal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-29

Review 4.  Ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy: technologic advancements.

Authors:  B Alexander; A I Fishman; M Grasso
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral lithiasis with pneumatic lithotripsy: analysis of 287 procedures in a public hospital.

Authors:  Kadir Ceylan; Orhan Sünbül; Adem Sahin; Mustafa Güneş
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-07-27

6.  Acute postoperative pain after ureteroscopic removal of stone: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Sun Tae Ahn; Jae Heon Kim; Jae Young Park; Du Geon Moon; Jae Hyun Bae
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-01-25

Review 7.  A transperitoneal laparoscopic approach to endourology.

Authors:  A M Kaynan; H N Winfield
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.862

8.  Ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral stones--influence of operator's experience and skill on the procedure outcome.

Authors:  Davor Librenjak; Marijan Šitum; Dijana Gugić; Kazimir Milostić; Mario Duvnjak
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  Evaluation of sexual function in patients submitted to ureteroscopic procedures.

Authors:  Bilal Eryildirim; Murat Tuncer; Cahit Sahin; Ugur Yucetas; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Ureteroscopic treatment of larger renal calculi (>2 cm).

Authors:  Demetrius H Bagley; Kelly A Healy; Nir Kleinmann
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-07-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.