Literature DB >> 7489169

Prospective evaluation of ultrasonography and liver function tests for preoperative assessment of the bile duct.

C R Welbourn1, J M Haworth, D J Leaper, M H Thompson.   

Abstract

Current means of predicting the presence of bile duct stones are sensitive but produce a large number of false-positive results, potentially leading to added morbidity from unnecessary invasive investigation. This study prospectively assessed 545 patients with gallbladder stones, including 55 patients with bile duct stones, to refine criteria for further investigation of the bile duct. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for bile duct dilatation (diameter abnormal if larger than 5 mm below age 50 years, normal value increasing by 1 mm per decade) and elevation of three liver function tests, singly or in combination. Depending on the number of abnormalities used the sensitivity ranged from 46 to 96 per cent and the positive predictive value from 35 to 77 per cent. All groupings gave at least 96 per cent negative predictive value for the absence of stones but none combined both high sensitivity and positive predictive value. The specificity was improved if the tests were done on the working day before operation. Refining criteria for predicting bile duct stones allows the selective use of cholangiography and may reduce the number of negative cholangiograms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7489169     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800821026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  Case report. Reoperative laparoscopic biliary surgery.

Authors:  M H Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Evidence based diagnosis: prior probability saves money, time, and possibly lives.

Authors:  Oscar M Jolobe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-09

3.  Symptoms of oesophageal reflux are more common following laparoscopic cholecystectomy than in a control population.

Authors:  D A McNamara; M K O'Donohoe; P G Horgan; W A Tanner; F B Keane
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  Selective MRCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Stuart Mercer; Sukhpal Singh; Iain Paterson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Acute transient hepatocellular injury in cholelithiasis and cholecystitis without evidence of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Chen-Wang Chang; Wen-Hsiung Chang; Ching-Chung Lin; Cheng-Hsin Chu; Tsang-En Wang; Shou-Chuan Shih
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  ERCP's role in the management of acute biliary-pancreatic pathology in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  J C Martín del Olmo; M Toledano; J I Blanco; C Cuesta; M Carbajo; C Vaquero; L Inglada; R Atienza; F Martin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Comparing the efficacy of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with intra-operative cholangiography in patients suspicious to biliary stones.

Authors:  Arash Mohammadi Tofigh; Forough Razmjoie; Alieh Khabbaz; Khosro Ayazi; Siamak Farahmand; Behzad Nemati Honar; Mohammad Reza Nikshoar
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2013
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.