Literature DB >> 7488970

Chernobyl experience: biological indicators of exposure to ionizing radiation.

A E Baranov1, A K Guskova, N M Nadejina.   

Abstract

Using the Chernobyl accident as an example, an attempt is made to consider the possibility of using the biological markers of exposure and effects of exposure to ionizing radiation in relation to biology dosimetry, and to predict early and late nonstochastic and stochastic radiation consequences. The biological dosimetry was based on the three markers: chromosome aberrations of peripheral blood lymphocytes, dynamics of blood cell (lymphocytes, neutrophils) counts and electron spin resonance (ESR) of tooth enamel. The first two methods can be applied in a short period of time (days or weeks) after exposure and only after high doses (> 0.5-1 Gy) of acute total body irradiation (TBI). The ESR tooth enamel method possesses dosimetric value at all conditions of uniform gamma TBI (acute, prolonged, chronic and high as well as low level of doses) and at any time after exposure. The low limit of sensitivity of the ESR test is about 0.1 Gy. The use of biological markers of effects of radiation exposure as early diagnostic signs was limited to clinical significant disorders of hemopoietic, immune systems and skin in conditions of acute high-dose irradiation. In cases of acute or prolonged irradiation in low doses, many changes on the cellular as well as organism level were discovered. However, there were not enough data on radiation specificity or dose dependence of these changes. Hence they cannot be considered as the indicators of clinically significant early and late nonstochastic effects. The role of biological markers of stochastic effects in clinical practice is discussed herein.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7488970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  12 in total

1.  Validation of a biomarker tool capable of measuring the absorbed dose soon after exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Anna Giovanetti; Raffaella Marconi; Noha Awad; Hala Abuzied; Neveen Agamy; Mohamed Barakat; Cecilia Bartoleschi; Gianluca Bossi; Marco Canfora; Amr A Elsaid; Laura Ioannilli; Horeya M Ismail; Yasmine Amr Issa; Flavia Novelli; Maria Chiara Pardini; Claudio Pioli; Paola Pinnarò; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Mohamed M Tahoun; Riccardo Turchi; Lidia Strigari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  After the bomb drops: a new look at radiation-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).

Authors:  Jacqueline P Williams; William H McBride
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Gilbert W. Beebe Symposium on 30 Years after the Chernobyl Accident: Current and Future Studies on Radiation Health Effects.

Authors:  Jonathan M Samet; Amy Berrington de González; Lawrence T Dauer; Maureen Hatch; Ourania Kosti; Fred A Mettler; Merriline M Satyamitra
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  First global consensus for evidence-based management of the hematopoietic syndrome resulting from exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Nicholas Dainiak; Robert Nicolas Gent; Zhanat Carr; Rita Schneider; Judith Bader; Elena Buglova; Nelson Chao; C Norman Coleman; Arnold Ganser; Claude Gorin; Martin Hauer-Jensen; L Andrew Huff; Patricia Lillis-Hearne; Kazuhiko Maekawa; Jeffrey Nemhauser; Ray Powles; Holger Schünemann; Alla Shapiro; Leif Stenke; Nelson Valverde; David Weinstock; Douglas White; Joseph Albanese; Viktor Meineke
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 1.385

Review 5.  Pharmacological management of ionizing radiation injuries: current and prospective agents and targeted organ systems.

Authors:  Vijay K Singh; Thomas M Seed
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 6.  Radiation injury after a nuclear detonation: medical consequences and the need for scarce resources allocation.

Authors:  Andrea L DiCarlo; Carmen Maher; John L Hick; Dan Hanfling; Nicholas Dainiak; Nelson Chao; Judith L Bader; C Norman Coleman; David M Weinstock
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.385

7.  Radiation-induced biomarkers for the detection and assessment of absorbed radiation doses.

Authors:  Sudha Rana; Raj Kumar; Sarwat Sultana; Rakesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2010-07

8.  HEMODOSE: A Biodosimetry Tool Based on Multi-type Blood Cell Counts.

Authors:  Shaowen Hu; William F Blakely; Francis A Cucinotta
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Meeting Report: A Poly-Pharmacy Approach to Mitigate Acute Radiation Syndrome.

Authors:  Lanyn P Taliaferro; David R Cassatt; Zulmarie Perez Horta; Merriline M Satyamitra
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Application of multivariate modeling for radiation injury assessment: a proof of concept.

Authors:  David L Bolduc; Vilmar Villa; David J Sandgren; G David Ledney; William F Blakely; Rolf Bünger
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.