Literature DB >> 7487857

The assessment of unwanted intrusive thoughts: a review and critique of the literature.

D A Clark1, C L Purdon.   

Abstract

In this paper we review the assessment and measurement of normal unwanted intrusive thoughts, images, and impulses that are considered the basis of clinical obsessions. After highlighting some difficulties with how the definition of cognitive intrusion has been applied to the development of assessment measures, we evaluate the construct validity of a number of retrospective self-report instruments such as the Intrusive Thoughts Questionnaire, Cognitive Intrusions Questionnaire, and Obsessional Intrusions Inventory, as well as interview and diary procedures. Measures of personal responsibility and meta-cognitive beliefs, which are still in the developmental phase, are also discussed. We conclude with a number of recommendations and areas of further research which would strengthen the construct validity of measures of intrusive thoughts and related constructs.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7487857     DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00030-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  5 in total

1.  Thought suppression across time: Change in frequency and duration of thought recurrence.

Authors:  Ann E Lambert; Yueqin Hu; Joshua C Magee; Jessica R Beadel; Bethany A Teachman
Journal:  J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.677

2.  Exploring the need for external input through the prism of social, material and sensation seeking input.

Authors:  Dario Krpan
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  Dimensionality Analysis of the Thought Suppression Inventory: Combining EFA, MSA, and CFA.

Authors:  Andreas A J Wismeijer
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2011-08-12

4.  The Neural Correlates of Positive Versus Negative Thought-action Fusion in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Sang Won Lee; Hyunsil Cha; Tae Yang Jang; Eunji Kim; Huijin Song; Yongmin Chang; Seung Jae Lee
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.582

5.  Differences between autogenous and reactive obsessions in terms of metacognitions and automatic thoughts.

Authors:  İlkay Keleş Altun; Emel Uysal; Evrim Özkorumak Karagüzel
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.570

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.