Literature DB >> 7487804

Head perturbations during walking while viewing a head-fixed target.

V E Das1, A Z Zivotofsky, A O DiScenna, R J Leigh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inexpensive, head-fixed computer displays are now available that subjects can wear during locomotion. HYPOTHESIS: Viewing a head-fixed visual display will change the characteristics of rotational head perturbations during natural walking.
METHODS: Using a 3-axis angular rate sensor, we measured head rotations during natural or treadmill walking, in 10 normal subjects and 2 patients with deficient vestibular function, as they attempted to view (A) a stationary target at optical infinity; and (B) a target at a distance of 20 cm rigidly attached to the head.
RESULTS: Normal subjects and patients showed no significant change in the predominant frequency of head rotations in any plane (ranging 0.7-5.7 Hz) during the two different viewing tasks (p > 0.1). Mean peak head velocities (ranging 6-36 degrees.s-1) also showed no difference during the two viewing conditions except in the yaw plane, in which values were greater while viewing the near target (p < 0.005). Predominant frequencies of head rotations were similar in the pitch plane during natural or treadmill walking; however, peak velocities of pitch head rotations were substantially greater during natural walking (p < 0.05). One vestibular patient showed modest increases of head velocity during natural walking compared with normal subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Rotational head perturbations that occur during natural walking are largely unaffected when subjects view a head-fixed target. There is need to study how such perturbations, which induce vestibular eye movements, affect vision of head-fixed displays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7487804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  6 in total

1.  Vestibular and non-vestibular contributions to eye movements that compensate for head rotations during viewing of near targets.

Authors:  Yanning H Han; Arun N Kumar; Millard F Reschke; Jeffrey T Somers; Louis F Dell'Osso; R John Leigh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modification of compensatory saccades after aVOR gain recovery.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Americo A Migliaccio; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Americo A Migliaccio; Richard A Clendaniel; Amir Allak; John P Carey
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Effect of vestibular rehabilitation on passive dynamic visual acuity.

Authors:  Matthew Scherer; Americo A Migliaccio; Michael C Schubert
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Reading from a Head-Fixed Display during Walking: Adverse Effects of Gaze Stabilization Mechanisms.

Authors:  Olivier Borg; Remy Casanova; Reinoud J Bootsma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Interactive wiimote gaze stabilization exercise training system for patients with vestibular hypofunction.

Authors:  Po-Yin Chen; Wan-Ling Hsieh; Shun-Hwa Wei; Chung-Lan Kao
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.262

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.