Literature DB >> 7487440

Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 1. Acute interventions.

S J Scheer1, K L Radack, D R O'Brien.   

Abstract

Employers and insurers are interested in being able to use cost-effective interventions for returning injured workers to the workplace. Unfortunately, truly objective information is lacking. The purpose of this and two subsequent review articles was to perform thorough scrutiny and methodologic comparison among all obtainable, published randomized and controlled studies on low back pain (LBP) interventions leading to return to work. The study was confined to English language articles published from 1975 through 1993. Of more than 4,000 LBP citations, more than 500 were chosen for review. Of that number, 35 articles met the selection criteria of randomization, reasonable controls, and work return comparisons. This paper focuses on the 10 articles relating to interventions for acute (less than 4 weeks) LBP, and considers bed rest, exercise, spinal manipulation, back school, and case management. A 26-point quality system was used to compare the methodologic rigor of each article. This literature survey demonstrated the meager scientific foundations on which our industrial rehabilitation programs are based.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7487440     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80076-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

Review 1.  Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Kimberley Cullen; Judy Clarke; Emma Irvin; Sandra Sinclair; John Frank
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

2.  The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain.

Authors:  L Gibson; J Strong
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-09

3.  A systematic review of controlled clinical trials on the prevention of back pain in industry.

Authors:  M N van Poppel; B W Koes; T Smid; L M Bouter
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave.

Authors:  Nicole Vogel; Stefan Schandelmaier; Thomas Zumbrunn; Shanil Ebrahim; Wout El de Boer; Jason W Busse; Regina Kunz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-30

Review 5.  Osteopathic manipulative treatment for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  John C Licciardone; Angela K Brimhall; Linda N King
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Rationale, design, and protocol for the prevention of low back pain in the military (POLM) trial (NCT00373009).

Authors:  Steven Z George; John D Childs; Deydre S Teyhen; Samuel S Wu; Alison C Wright; Jessica L Dugan; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.