Literature DB >> 7487255

The influence of clinical risk factors on the use of angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Investigators.

J A Spertus1, N S Weiss, N R Every, W D Weaver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization provides the greatest survival advantage in those patients with the greatest mortality risk. This study examines the relationship between variables that predict mortality and the use of angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction.
METHODS: Study of 4823 survivors of acute myocardial infarction, who underwent angiography between 6 hours and 5 days of admission, to determine the relationship between factors that predict mortality and the use of angiography (n = 2274), angioplasty (n = 692), and bypass surgery (n = 469).
RESULTS: Except for recurrent angina, clinical factors that predict higher mortality were associated with a lower use of angiography (the multivariable adjusted odds ratio was 0.47 for older age, 0.85 for a history of infarction, 0.50 for patients not receiving thrombolytic medications, 0.64 for new heart failure, and 2.75 for recurrent angina [P < .001 for all factors]). A similar relationship was observed among patients selected for angioplasty (the odds ratio was 0.51 for an ejection fraction of < 40%, 0.72 for those patients not receiving thrombolytic medications, 0.74 for a history of infarction, and 1.94 for recurrent angina [P < .001 for all factors]). In contrast, patients with unfavorable prognostic profiles were much more likely to undergo coronary bypass surgery (the odds ratio was 1.46 for recurrent angina, 1.28 for older age groups, 2.23 for new heart failure, 1.28 for patients not receiving thrombolytic medications, and 1.46 for a history of infarction [P < .001 for all factors]).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that aside from symptoms of recurrent angina, the use of angiography and angioplasty is not driven by mortality risk stratification. In contrast, bypass surgery is preferentially performed in patients at increased risk for mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7487255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  7 in total

Review 1.  Risk assessment after myocardial infarction: have the rules changed with thrombolytic therapy?.

Authors:  M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Do race and gender influence the use of invasive procedures?

Authors:  R E Watson; A D Stein; F C Dwamena; J Kroll; R Mitra; B A McIntosh; P Vasilenko; M M Holmes-Rovner; Q Chen; J Kupersmith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Personalizing the decision of dabigatran versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation: A secondary analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulation therapY (RE-LY) trial.

Authors:  Samuel W Reinhardt; Nihar R Desai; Yuanyuan Tang; Philip G Jones; Jeremy Ader; John A Spertus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Process of care and outcome after acute myocardial infarction for patients with mental illness in the VA health care system: are there disparities?

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Benjamin G Druss; Robert A Rosenheck
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Vision and creation of the American Heart Association pharmaceutical roundtable outcomes research centers.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; John A Spertus; David J Cohen; Mark A Hlatky; Alan S Go; Barbara G Vickrey; Jeffrey L Saver; Patricia C Hinton
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-11

6.  Outcomes research in the development and evaluation of practice guidelines.

Authors:  Louise Pilote; Ira B Tager
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-03-25       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Precision medicine to improve use of bleeding avoidance strategies and reduce bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prospective cohort study before and after implementation of personalized bleeding risks.

Authors:  John A Spertus; Carole Decker; Elizabeth Gialde; Philip G Jones; Edward J McNulty; Richard Bach; Adnan K Chhatriwalla
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-03-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.