Literature DB >> 7486446

Methods to decrease the morbidity of abdominoperineal resection.

H Farid1, T X O'Connell.   

Abstract

Recent reports stress that abdominoperineal resections (APR) are associated with many complications, including hemorrhage, long hospitalization, and delayed closure of an open perineal wound. Thirty-five patients underwent an abdominoperineal resection for cancer at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles, from January 1989 to December 1993. All patients, except two, had their perineal wound closed after closure of the peritoneum and insertion of closed system suction catheters. Ninety-one per cent of patients achieved successful primary healing. Three patients (8.5%) suffered perineal wound dehiscence. Overall morbidity was 55 per cent, with urinary retention being the most common, occurring in 23 per cent of patients. This was managed successfully by early in-and-out self catheterization. There was no incidence of urinary tract infections. There were no operative deaths. Length of stay averaged 8.6 days, with a median of 7 days. Five patients had previous radiation therapy. Of those, two (40%) had perineal wound dehiscence, compared to only one of 33 (3.3%) patients without previous radiation. APRs can be done with minimal mortality, although with an increased morbidity in irradiated patients. Primary closure and drainage of the perineal wound significantly lowers the complication rate, as does early Foley removal and self in-and-out catheterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7486446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

1.  Complications of perineal surgery.

Authors:  James W Ogilvie; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

2.  Wound dehiscence after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer is associated with decreased survival.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; David L Berger; Paul C Shellito; Patrica Sylla; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of biological mesh reconstruction versus primary perineal closure after abdominoperineal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nasir Zaheer Ahmad; Muhammad Hasan Abbas; Noof Mohammed A B Al-Naimi; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Epidermoid cancer of the anal canal.

Authors:  Shawn P Webb; Chong S Lee
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-09

Review 5.  Management of the Perineal Defect after Abdominoperineal Excision.

Authors:  Colin Peirce; Sean Martin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

6.  Long-term comorbidity of diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for perineal wound complications after an abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Kenji Matsuda; Tsukasa Hotta; Katsunari Takifuji; Shozo Yokoyama; Takashi Higashiguchi; Toshiji Tominaga; Yoshimasa Oku; Toru Nasu; Koichi Tamura; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: is the pelvic drain externalization site an independent risk factor for perineal wound healing?

Authors:  M G Pramateftakis; D Raptis; D Kanellos; E Christoforidis; G Tsoulfas; I Kanellos; Ch Lazaridis
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-06

8.  Reconstruction of Perineal Defects: A Comparison of the Myocutaneous Gracilis and the Gluteal Fold Flap in Interdisciplinary Anorectal Tumor Resection.

Authors:  Jan R Thiele; Janick Weber; Hannes P Neeff; Philipp Manegold; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; G B Stark; Steffen U Eisenhardt
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.