Literature DB >> 7486359

Randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide for emergency department treatment of migraine headache.

M Coppola1, D M Yealy, R A Leibold.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the comparative efficacy of i.v. metoclopramide and prochlorperazine for the initial emergency department treatment of migraine headache.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
SETTING: Military community hospital ED with an annual census of 75,000. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy consenting adults from a convenience sample of patients presenting with migraine headache similar to that experienced in at least one prior episode. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, fever, signs of meningismus, altered sensorium, drug or alcohol use, oxygen saturation less than 90%, recent trauma or seizure, "worst headache," abnormal blood pressure, recent (within 48 hours) use of metoclopramide or prochlorperazine, and allergy to metoclopramide or prochlorperazine.
INTERVENTIONS: In a random manner, each subject received a 2-mL i.v. injection of identical-appearing fluid containing metoclopramide (10 mg), prochlorperazine (10 mg), or saline solution (placebo). No other analgesics or medications were administered during the initial study period; rescue agents were administered by the choice of the treating physician after all data were collected. MEASUREMENTS: Patients scored their nausea, pain, and sedation before receiving the 2-mL injections and at 30 minutes after injection. Ten-centimeter nonhatched visual analog scales were used for these measurements, with distance from the left end (zero) calculated for each use. Clinically important successful treatment was defined a priori as achievement of the following criteria: patient satisfaction and either a decrease of 50% or more in the 30-minute pain score (compared with the initial score) or an absolute pain score of 2.5 cm or less. Failure to achieve these criteria constituted treatment failure. Differences between groups were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and chi 2 tests. Data are reported as frequency percentages and median values, with a two-tailed P value of .05 or less considered significant.
RESULTS: Nausea, pain, and sedation scores were similar in all three groups before therapy. Thirty minutes after treatment, pain scores differed among those treated with prochlorperazine (1.1 cm), with metoclopramide (3.9 cm), and with placebo (6.1 cm, P = .003). Clinical success occurred more commonly after treatment with prochlorperazine (82%) than after metoclopramide (46%) or placebo (29%, P = .03). However, metoclopramide and placebo scores did not differ (P = .14). Nausea tended to be improved after prochlorperazine, compared with metoclopramide or placebo, at 30 minutes (P = .64). Four patients (6%) returned to the ED for relapse of migraine headache within 24 hours (three in the placebo group and one in the metoclopramide group).
CONCLUSION: i.v. prochlorperazine relieves the headache and tends to improve nausea better than metoclopramide in ED patients with acute migraine headache.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7486359     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70001-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  38 in total

1.  Rate of metoclopramide infusion affects the severity and incidence of akathisia.

Authors:  I Parlak; R Atilla; M Cicek; M Parlak; B Erdur; M Guryay; M Sever; S Karaduman
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Migraine during pregnancy: options for therapy.

Authors:  Anthony W Fox; Merle L Diamond; Egilius L H Spierings
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  The non-antiemetic uses of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  A J Greenshaw; P H Silverstone
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Migraine and epilepsy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Christopher B Oakley; Eric H Kossoff
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-03

5.  Treatment of acute migraine in the emergency department.

Authors:  Saurabh Gupta; Richard Oosthuizen; Simon Pulfrey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Prospective, randomised, double blind, controlled comparison of metoclopramide and pethidine in the emergency treatment of acute primary vascular and tension type headache episodes.

Authors:  M Cicek; O Karcioglu; I Parlak; V Ozturk; O Duman; M Serinken; M Guryay
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Standardizing emergency department-based migraine research: an analysis of commonly used clinical trial outcome measures.

Authors:  Benjamin W Friedman; Polly E Bijur; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Headache in pregnancy.

Authors:  Dawn A Marcus
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 9.  Treatment of pediatric migraine in the emergency room.

Authors:  Amy A Gelfand; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.372

10.  Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous methylergonovine in migraine female patients attending the emergency department: a pilot open-label study.

Authors:  Alfredo I Niño-Maldonado; Gary Caballero-García; Wilfrido Mercado-Bochero; Fernando Rico-Villademoros; Elena P Calandre
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.