Literature DB >> 7486088

Epidural ropivacaine infusion for postoperative analgesia after major lower abdominal surgery--a dose finding study.

D A Scott1, D M Chamley, P H Mooney, R K Deam, A H Mark, B Hägglöf.   

Abstract

Ropivacaine exhibits less cardiotoxicity and causes less motor block than bupivacaine when used in equianalgesic doses. This makes ropivacaine potentially well suited for epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study was to determine which of three concentrations of epidurally administered ropivacaine infused for postoperative analgesia would attenuate intravenous opioid analgesia requirements while also minimizing motor block. Forty ASA I-III patients, having major lower abdominal surgery, completed the study. They were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: Group S, control, epidural saline (n = 10); Group 1, epidural 0.1% ropivacaine (n = 10); Group 2, epidural 0.2% ropivacaine (n = 10); and Group 3, epidural 0.3% ropivacaine (n = 10). The study was double-blind. Initial epidural analgesia was established with 0.5% ropivacaine, and then general anesthesia induced for surgery. Once in the recovery room, epidural infusions were commenced at 10 mL/h and maintained at that rate for 21 h. Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine was used as required by the patients for supplemental analgesia. Total PCA morphine use was more over the 21-h period in Group S than all the ropivacaine groups, being significantly so for Group 2 (median values: Group S, 43.3 mg; Group 1, 18.7 mg; Group 2, 7.5 mg; Group 3, 19 mg; for Group 2, P = 0.03). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores on coughing were significantly lower (i.e., less pain) than control for all ropivacaine groups after 4 h of infusion and also for Groups 2 and 3 after 8 h of infusion. (Median VAS (mm) on coughing at 8 h: Group S = 70, Group 1 = 56, Group 2 = 32, Group 3 = 0; for Groups 2 and 3, P < 0.05 compared to Group S). There was a dose-related increase in the amount of motor block, with Group 3 having significantly more motor block than all other groups at 4 and 8 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7486088     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199511000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  14 in total

1.  A comparison of epidural infusion of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3% ropivacaine with fentanyl after unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jae Ho Lee; Nam Oh Kim; Eun Kyoung Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-08

Review 2.  Drug interactions with patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  Jorn Lotsch; Carsten Skarke; Irmgard Tegeder; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Comparison of pain management after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with and without epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Yoshitomo Yanagimoto; Shuji Takiguchi; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Jota Mikami; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Preliminary risk-benefit analysis of ropivacaine in labour and following surgery.

Authors:  I Cederholm
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  K J McClellan; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Benefit-risk assessment of ropivacaine in the management of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Wolfgang Zink; Bernhard M Graf
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  [Peridural application of ropivacaine and clonidine for pain therapy after prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Voje; A Manohin
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Epidural ropivacaine infusion for the treatment of pain following axillary muscle-sparing thoracotomy: a dose-evaluation study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sakai; Shiro Tomiyasu; Koji Sumikawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Analgesic efficacy and outcome of transversus-abdominis plane block versus low thoracic-epidural analgesia after laparotomy in ischemic heart disease patients.

Authors:  Sherif Samir Wahba; Sahar Mohammed Kamal
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 10.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.