Literature DB >> 7485436

Postcranial estimates of body weight in Proconsul, with a note on a distal tibia of P. major from Napak, Uganda.

K L Rafferty1, A Walker, C B Ruff, M D Rose, P J Andrews.   

Abstract

A distal tibia of Proconsul major from Napak, Uganda, is described. It is morphologically similar to other Proconsul tibiae, only much larger in size. This specimen and others are used to estimate the body weight of P. major from postcrania for the first time. Body weight is predicted from articular and diaphyseal dimensions using regression equations derived from a modern comparative sample of catarrhine primates. The estimated body weight of P. major based on the Napak tibia is 86.7 kg, whereas two other P. major specimens are smaller, giving a total range of 63.4-86.7 kg and an average of 75.1 kg. The regression equations are also used to predict the body weight of specimens from Rusinga/Mfangano belonging to P. nyanzae and P. heseloni. As the body weight estimates generated here are consistent with previous postcranial-based estimates for Proconsul species, the two sets of estimates are pooled to give means of 10.9 kg for P. heseloni (n = 6) and 35.6 kg for P. nyanzae (n = 12). These findings support the traditional assignment of two species at Rusinga/Mfangano. The postcranial body weight estimates for the three species of Proconsul are compared to body weights estimated from M1 area in order to investigate possible differences in scaling between the teeth and limbs in these species. Despite being based on a smaller sample size, the postcranial estimates clearly differentiate the three taxa, whereas the dental estimates form a more continuous distribution. Molar area overestimates body weight in P. heseloni, indicating that it is megadont compared to a large sample of modern anthropoid primates. In contrast, molar area underestimates body weight in P. Nyanzae and especially P. major, suggesting relative microdonty in these taxa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7485436     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330970406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  9 in total

1.  Comparative and functional anatomy of phalanges in Nacholapithecus kerioi, a Middle Miocene hominoid from northern Kenya.

Authors:  Masato Nakatsukasa; Yutaka Kunimatsu; Yoshihiko Nakano; Tomo Takano; Hidemi Ishida
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 2.163

Review 2.  Morphology and environment in some fossil Hominoids and Pedetids (Mammalia).

Authors:  Brigitte Senut
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  New proconsuloid postcranials from the early Miocene of Kenya.

Authors:  Daniel L Gebo; Nasser R Malit; Isaiah Odhiambo Nengo
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 2.163

4.  New infant cranium from the African Miocene sheds light on ape evolution.

Authors:  Isaiah Nengo; Paul Tafforeau; Christopher C Gilbert; John G Fleagle; Ellen R Miller; Craig Feibel; David L Fox; Josh Feinberg; Kelsey D Pugh; Camille Berruyer; Sara Mana; Zachary Engle; Fred Spoor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Locomotion and posture from the common hominoid ancestor to fully modern hominins, with special reference to the last common panin/hominin ancestor.

Authors:  R H Crompton; E E Vereecke; S K S Thorpe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  Why are there apes? Evidence for the co-evolution of ape and monkey ecomorphology.

Authors:  Kevin D Hunt
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  The evolution of human and ape hand proportions.

Authors:  Sergio Almécija; Jeroen B Smaers; William L Jungers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Wrist morphology reveals substantial locomotor diversity among early catarrhines: an analysis of capitates from the early Miocene of Tinderet (Kenya).

Authors:  Craig Wuthrich; Laura M MacLatchy; Isaiah O Nengo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evidence of a chimpanzee-sized ancestor of humans but a gibbon-sized ancestor of apes.

Authors:  Mark Grabowski; William L Jungers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.