S R Seiff1, M Boerner, S R Carter. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco 94143-0730, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Because ocular exposure is a major complication of facial paralysis, an external gold eyelid load weight was evaluated for effectiveness in the treatment of this problem. METHODS: We prospectively studied 12 patients with unilateral facial paralysis who were treated with the external eyelid weights. Follow-up examinations included corneal exposure, amount of artificial tear usage, patient comfort, and complications associated with the weights. Treatment end points were the patient's decision to undergo a canthoplasty or placement of an implanted weight or resolution of the facial paresis to better than House's grade IV/VI. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients studied, ten had decreased corneal exposure on the affected side, with a coincident decrease in artificial tear drop use and increased comfort. One patient had no improvement in a corneal defect, and one was unable to apply the weight. Five patients had some difficulty in positioning the weight, which was related to upper eyelid dermatochalasis in four of the five. Only two weights were lost in over two years of total wearing time. CONCLUSIONS: External eyelid weights are useful in the treatment of ocular exposure associated with facial paralysis. The weights decreased corneal exposure, decreased reliance on artificial tear drops, and increased patient comfort. The weights were helpful as a trial before implantation of eyelid weights and as a longer-term treatment for ocular exposure in patients with temporary facial paralysis. Loose upper eyelid skin may limit their usefulness in some patients.
PURPOSE: Because ocular exposure is a major complication of facial paralysis, an external gold eyelid load weight was evaluated for effectiveness in the treatment of this problem. METHODS: We prospectively studied 12 patients with unilateral facial paralysis who were treated with the external eyelid weights. Follow-up examinations included corneal exposure, amount of artificial tear usage, patient comfort, and complications associated with the weights. Treatment end points were the patient's decision to undergo a canthoplasty or placement of an implanted weight or resolution of the facial paresis to better than House's grade IV/VI. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients studied, ten had decreased corneal exposure on the affected side, with a coincident decrease in artificial tear drop use and increased comfort. One patient had no improvement in a corneal defect, and one was unable to apply the weight. Five patients had some difficulty in positioning the weight, which was related to upper eyelid dermatochalasis in four of the five. Only two weights were lost in over two years of total wearing time. CONCLUSIONS: External eyelid weights are useful in the treatment of ocular exposure associated with facial paralysis. The weights decreased corneal exposure, decreased reliance on artificial tear drops, and increased patient comfort. The weights were helpful as a trial before implantation of eyelid weights and as a longer-term treatment for ocular exposure in patients with temporary facial paralysis. Loose upper eyelid skin may limit their usefulness in some patients.