Literature DB >> 7485286

Delivery of the nonvertex second twin: breech extraction versus external cephalic version.

S P Chauhan1, W E Roberts, R A McLaren, H Roach, J C Morrison, J N Martin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin gestations in which the nonvertex second twin was delivered by total breech extraction versus those delivered by external cephalic version. STUDY
DESIGN: The intrapartum courses of 284 consecutive twin gestations were analyzed retrospectively. Once those with actual birth weight < 600 gm, unrecognized multifetal pregnancy, multiple congenital anomalies, cesarean delivery, and/or antepartum intrauterine fetal death were excluded, 23 mothers were delivered by total breech extraction and 21 underwent external cephalic version.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar for mean (+/- SD) maternal age, gravidity, parity, gestational age at delivery, ultrasonographic estimate of birth weight for twin B, incidence of breech or transverse presentation for the second fetus, and actual birth weight of the first or second newborn. Suspected fetal distress that led to cesarean delivery occurred significantly more often in parturients who underwent attempted external version (4/21) than total breech extraction (0/23, p = 0.04). The incidence of eventual abdominal delivery was also significantly higher in patients who underwent attempted external cephalic version (10/21) rather than breech extraction (1/23, p = 0.001). For twin B the occurrence of low Apgar scores at 1 minute was significantly higher for infants after attempted external version (7/21) rather than breech extraction (1/23, p = 0.02), but the mean pH, number with Apgar scores < 7 at 5 minutes, and number of neonatal intensive care unit admissions were similar. No perinatal traumatic injury occurred in either group.
CONCLUSION: On the basis of our experience, total breech extraction of the nonvertex second twin is preferable to external cephalic version because it appears to be associated with a significantly lower incidence of fetal distress and abdominal delivery with comparable neonatal outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7485286     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91319-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  An evidence-based approach to determining route of delivery for twin gestations.

Authors:  Diane Christopher; Barrett K Robinson; Alan M Peaceman
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011

2.  Childbirth education for multiple pregnancy: part 2: intrapartum and postpartum considerations.

Authors:  Kristen S Montgomery; Sabrina Cubera; Christie Belcher; David Patrick; Heather Funderburk; Christa Melton; Michelle Fastenau
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Mode of delivery in non-cephalic presenting twins: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charlotte N Steins Bisschop; Tatjana E Vogelvang; Anne M May; Nico W E Schuitemaker
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  [Transverse presentation and modalities of delivery: caesarean section versus large internal cephalic version and breech extraction; about 162 births at the maternity Jason Sendwe of Lubumbashi, DR Congo].

Authors:  Julien Kimbala; Olivier Mukuku; Xavier Kinenkinda; Justin Kizonde
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2014-11-18

5.  The effect of twin-to-twin delivery time intervals on neonatal outcome for second twins.

Authors:  L Lindroos; A Elfvin; L Ladfors; U-B Wennerholm
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Relationship between twin-to-twin delivery interval and umbilical artery acid-base status in the second twin.

Authors:  Young Hoon Suh; Kyo Hoon Park; Joon-Seok Hong; Bo Hyun Yoon; Soon Sup Shim; Joong Shin Park; Jong Kwan Jun; Hee Chul Syn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.