Literature DB >> 7484826

Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients referred because of suspected coronary artery disease.

M Kamaran1, S M Teague, R S Finkelhor, N Dawson, R C Bahler.   

Abstract

To determine whether dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) provides prognostic information beyond that available from routine clinical data, we reviewed the outcome of 210 consecutive patients referred for DSE to evaluate chest pain, perioperative risk, and myocardial viability. Dobutamine was infused in increments of 10 micrograms/kg/min in 5-minute stages to a maximum of 40 micrograms/kg/min. The dobutamine stress echocardiogram was considered abnormal only if dobutamine induced a new wall motion abnormality as determined by review of the digitized echocardiographic images in a quad screen format and on videotape. Thirty percent of tests were abnormal. An abnormal test was more common (p < or = 0.02) in men and patients with angina pectoris, in patients taking nitrate therapy, or those with prior myocardial infarction or abnormal left ventricular wall motion at rest. Twenty-two deaths, 17 of which were cardiac, occurred over a median follow-up of 240 days (range 30 to 760). Sixteen cardiac deaths occurred in the 63 patients with versus 1 cardiac death among the 147 without a new wall motion abnormality (p < or = 0.0001). Other variables associated with cardiac death (p < or = 0.05) were age > 65 years, nitrate therapy, ventricular ectopy during DSE, suspected angina pectoris, and hospitalization at the time of DSE. When cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization procedures were all considered as adverse outcomes, a new wall motion abnormality continued to be the most powerful predictor of an adverse cardiac event.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7484826     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80255-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Post-myocardial infarction risk stratification with stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging versus echocardiography: separate but not equal.

Authors:  K A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with previous coronary revascularisation.

Authors:  M Bountioukos; A Elhendy; R T van Domburg; A F L Schinkel; J J Bax; B J Krenning; E Biagini; V Rizzello; M L Simoons; D Poldermans
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  The Scandinavian multicenter hemodynamic evaluation of the SJM Regent aortic valve.

Authors:  Jon Offstad; Kai Andersen; Per Paulsson; Jesper Andreasson; Ulf Kjellman; Oluf Lundblad; Karl Gunnar Engstrøm; Rune Haaverstad; Jan L Svennevig
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Long Term Outcomes in Stress Echocardiography: Ten Year Follow up of a Cohort in a Single Centre.

Authors:  Reza Ashrafi; Ewan McKay; Julia Jones; Aham Amadi
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2012-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.