PURPOSE: To determine whether plain films alone are sufficient in the evaluation of stability of simple wedge-compression fractures of the lumbar spine. METHODS: Plain films and CT scans of 53 consecutive patients seen during a 2-year period with lumbar spine fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Six readers blinded to the CT diagnosis independently read each patient's plain films. Plain-film findings were scored on a five-point graded response scale using criteria proposed by Gehweiler and Daffner. In addition, a fracture was considered to be possibly unstable if there was involvement of more than one vertebral level or greater than 50% loss of anterior vertebral body height. CT findings represented the standard for comparison. CT scans were independently evaluated by three additional readers. Two-column involvement, middle-column involvement alone but with retropulsion, multiple-level involvement, or greater than 50% loss of vertebral height indicated potential instability. RESULTS: For 14 stable and 39 potentially unstable lumbar spine fractures, the pooled (mean) plain-film negative predictive value for detection of potentially unstable fractures was 0.62 (95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.70), with a sensitivity of 0.83 (95%, confidence interval; 0.78 to 0.87), and specificity of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.87). CONCLUSION: Plain films are not adequate for determining stability of lumbar spine fractures.
PURPOSE: To determine whether plain films alone are sufficient in the evaluation of stability of simple wedge-compression fractures of the lumbar spine. METHODS: Plain films and CT scans of 53 consecutive patients seen during a 2-year period with lumbar spine fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Six readers blinded to the CT diagnosis independently read each patient's plain films. Plain-film findings were scored on a five-point graded response scale using criteria proposed by Gehweiler and Daffner. In addition, a fracture was considered to be possibly unstable if there was involvement of more than one vertebral level or greater than 50% loss of anterior vertebral body height. CT findings represented the standard for comparison. CT scans were independently evaluated by three additional readers. Two-column involvement, middle-column involvement alone but with retropulsion, multiple-level involvement, or greater than 50% loss of vertebral height indicated potential instability. RESULTS: For 14 stable and 39 potentially unstable lumbar spine fractures, the pooled (mean) plain-film negative predictive value for detection of potentially unstable fractures was 0.62 (95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.70), with a sensitivity of 0.83 (95%, confidence interval; 0.78 to 0.87), and specificity of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.87). CONCLUSION: Plain films are not adequate for determining stability of lumbar spine fractures.
Authors: Torsten Diekhoff; Nils Engelhard; Michael Fuchs; Matthias Pumberger; Michael Putzier; Jürgen Mews; Marcus Makowski; Bernd Hamm; Kay-Geert A Hermann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Pablo Tomás Muñoz; Elena Moya Sánchez; Marta Revelles Paniza; Alberto Martínez Martínez; Antonio Luis Pérez Abela Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2016-12
Authors: Guen Young Lee; Ji Young Hwang; Na Ra Kim; Yusuhn Kang; Miyoung Choi; Jimin Kim; Eun Ju Ha; Jung Hwan Baek Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.500