Literature DB >> 7484124

Stem fracture with the Exeter prosthesis. 3 of 27 hips followed for 10 years.

M Røkkum1, K Bye, K R Hetland, A Reigstad.   

Abstract

We report the results of a 9-11-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of 27 Exeter prostheses in which cement pressurizing technique was employed. 3 stems fractured and 3 other stems and 1 cup underwent aseptic loosening. The remaining prostheses had satisfactory clinical and radiographic results. Stem subsidence was seen only as part of a loosening process. We suspect that the pronounced taper design is responsible for the poor results. While the slender and weak distal end is fixed in a thick cement mantle, the wide proximal part allows only a thin cement layer, easily subjected to mechanical disintegration. Proximal debonding increases both the stress on the distal part of the stem and the distal bone-cement interface shear stress. Hence, we believe that the same process underlies both the loosenings and the stem fractures. The presently employed Exeter stem is manufactured from the stronger Orthinox steel, which may diminish the risk for fracture, but it has retained the extreme taper design. It is not likely that a polished surface or improved cementing will prevent stem fracture. Therefore, one should still be concerned about late fractures of the Exeter stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7484124     DOI: 10.3109/17453679508995581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  4 in total

1.  A series of four fractured Exeter™ stems in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B M Davies; H A Branford White; A Temple
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The innovation trap.

Authors:  Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Bilateral Universal Exeter™ Femoral Stem Fracture.

Authors:  NazmiBulent Alp; Nejat Guney
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2019

4.  Neck fracture of the Exeter stem in 3 patients: A cause for concern?

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Antti Eskelinen; Jorma Pajamäki; Timo Puolakka
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.