Literature DB >> 7482713

The impact of immunosuppressive regimens on the cost of liver transplantation--results from the U.S. FK506 multicenter trial.

J R Lake1, K J Gorman, C O Esquivel, R H Wiesner, G B Klintmalm, C M Miller, B W Shaw, J A Gordon.   

Abstract

In an effort to determine the total one-year cost of liver transplantation, the underlying drivers of that cost, and any cost differences between alternative immunosuppressive regimens, an analysis was performed comparing the average one-year posttransplant charges of 322 patients participating in the "U.S. Multi-center Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing FK-506 to Cyclosporine in Liver Transplantation." Total one-year inpatient charges including all readmissions were examined. Professional fees and outpatient charges were excluded. Costs for tacrolimus drug and blood assays were assumed to be equal to those in the CsA group. For patients completing the study, the tacrolimus group had an average length of stay and average one-year cost seven days (P = .06) and $19,290 (P = .05) lower than the CsA group. The difference in rejection profiles between the two arms seems to largely account for the lower costs. The tacrolimus arm consistently had fewer patients in the more severe rejection groups. Increased incidence and severity of rejection were directly related to higher average lengths of stay and costs of transplantation (P < .001). Tacrolimus immunosuppression during the first year after liver transplantation is more cost-effective than CsA in achieving similar patient and graft survival rates. Differing incidence and severity of rejection can dramatically affect the first-year cost of liver transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7482713     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199511270-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  7 in total

1.  Temporal trends in early clinical outcomes and health care resource utilization for liver transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Ricardo Pietrobon; Carlos E Marroquin; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Paul C Kuo; Bradley H Collins; Dev M Desai; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Tacrolimus: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in the management of organ transplantation.

Authors:  G L Plosker; R H Foster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral). A pharmacoeconomic review of its use compared with standard cyclosporin in renal and hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  A J Coukell; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Tacrolimus. An update of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of organ transplantation.

Authors:  C M Spencer; K L Goa; J C Gillis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Mycophenolate mofetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Melissa Young; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Maintenance immunosuppression for adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Manuel Rodríguez-Perálvarez; Marta Guerrero-Misas; Douglas Thorburn; Brian R Davidson; Emmanuel Tsochatzis; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  Transplant Recipients Using Tacrolimus Had Higher Utilization of Healthcare Services Than Those Receiving Cyclosporine in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yi-Chang Lin; Chien-Sung Tsai; I-Hsun Li; Yi-Ting Tsai; Tien-Yu Huang; Kwai-Fong Lee; Chih-Sheng Lin; Jui-Hu Shih; Li-Ting Kao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.