Literature DB >> 7482680

The effect of the sex of interviewers on the quality of data in a Nigerian family planning questionnaire.

S Becker1, K Feyisetan, P Makinwa-Adebusoye.   

Abstract

Traditionally, female interviewers have been preferred to men for conducting fertility and family planning surveys. However, in West Africa, evidence for their superiority over male interviewers is mixed. In Nigeria, as part of a four-state pretest of the national family planning questionnaire, an experimental design was incorporated to quantify effects of the sex of the interviewer. In one state, reinterviews were also performed to measure the reliability of responses. In the conservative northern state of Kano, the use of male interviewers was problematic. However, in the other three states, only weak evidence was found to mitigate against the use of male interviewers. In fact, in two states, the proportion of respondents reporting knowledge of several contraceptive methods was significantly higher when male interviewers conducted the survey. Respondents' reports of contraceptive use were very unreliable for interviewers of both sexes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Africa; Africa South Of The Sahara; Data Analysis; Data Quality; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; English Speaking Africa; Family Planning; Family Planning Surveys; Fertility; Fertility Measurements; Fertility Surveys; Interviewers; Nigeria; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Sex Factors; Studies; Survey Personnel; Surveys; Western Africa

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7482680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Fam Plann        ISSN: 0039-3665


  10 in total

1.  Let's Talk about Sex, Maybe: Interviewers, Respondents, and Sexual Behavior Reporting in Rural South Africa.

Authors:  Brian Houle; Nicole Angotti; Samuel J Clark; Jill Williams; F Xavier Gómez-Olivé; Jane Menken; Chodziwadziwa Kabudula; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Stephen M Tollman
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2015-08-13

2.  Reporting on first sexual experience: The importance of interviewer-respondent interaction.

Authors:  Michelle Poulin
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2010-03-03

Review 3.  Interviewer effects in public health surveys.

Authors:  R E Davis; M P Couper; N K Janz; C H Caldwell; K Resnicow
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-09-17

4.  The Malawi Diffusion and Ideational Change Project 2004-06: Data collection, data quality, and analysis of attrition.

Authors:  Philip Anglewicz; Jimi Adams; Francis Obare; Hans-Peter Kohler; Susan Watkins
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2009-05-05

5.  You Know What I Know: Interviewer Knowledge Effects in Subjective Expectation Elicitation.

Authors:  Jason T Kerwin; Natalia Ordaz Reynoso
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2021-02-01

6.  The perils of straying from protocol: sampling bias and interviewer effects.

Authors:  Carrie J Ngongo; Kevin D Frick; Allen W Hightower; Florence Alice Mathingau; Heather Burke; Robert F Breiman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Forgotten marriages? Measuring the reliability of marriage histories.

Authors:  Sophia Chae
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2014-01-16

8.  Interviewer effects on abortion reporting: a multilevel analysis of household survey responses in Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria and Rajasthan, India.

Authors:  Katy Footman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Measuring Support for Women's Political Leadership: Gender of Interviewer Effects Among African Survey Respondents.

Authors:  Aksel Sundström; Daniel Stockemer
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2022-09-02

10.  Family Planning for Strangers: An Experiment on the Validity of Reported Contraceptive Use.

Authors:  Guy Stecklov; Alexander A Weinreb; Mariano Sana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.