L Kalra1, J Eade. 1. Orpington Stroke Unit, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke unit rehabilitation tends to be directed toward stroke patients with moderately severe disabilities ("the middle group"). Data collected on a stroke rehabilitation unit, however, showed improving outcome over 3 years in patients with a poor prognosis (discharge home: 48% versus 16%, P < .02; discharge Barthel Index score: 9 versus 6, P < .05). The hypothesis that stroke rehabilitation units may improve outcome in severely disabled stroke patients was tested in this study. METHODS: A randomized controlled study was undertaken in 71 patients with a poor prognosis who were treated either on a stroke rehabilitation unit (n = 34) or on general wards (n = 37) to compare outcome between the two groups. Data collected were also compared with those from a methodologically similar study undertaken 3 years ago. RESULTS:Severe stroke patients treated on the stroke rehabilitation unit had a significantly better outcome compared with general wards (mortality: 21% versus 46%, P < .05; discharge home 47% versus 19%, P < .01; median length of hospital stay: 43 versus 59 days, P < .02). The number of stroke unit patients being discharged home had increased significantly from the previous study, with a trend toward improvement in median discharge Barthel Index score. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke rehabilitation units may improve outcome in severe stroke patients. This improvement appears to be due to the development of innovative management strategies that reduce mortality and institutionalization and enable caregivers to support more disabled stroke patients at home.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Stroke unit rehabilitation tends to be directed toward strokepatients with moderately severe disabilities ("the middle group"). Data collected on a stroke rehabilitation unit, however, showed improving outcome over 3 years in patients with a poor prognosis (discharge home: 48% versus 16%, P < .02; discharge Barthel Index score: 9 versus 6, P < .05). The hypothesis that stroke rehabilitation units may improve outcome in severely disabled strokepatients was tested in this study. METHODS: A randomized controlled study was undertaken in 71 patients with a poor prognosis who were treated either on a stroke rehabilitation unit (n = 34) or on general wards (n = 37) to compare outcome between the two groups. Data collected were also compared with those from a methodologically similar study undertaken 3 years ago. RESULTS: Severe strokepatients treated on the stroke rehabilitation unit had a significantly better outcome compared with general wards (mortality: 21% versus 46%, P < .05; discharge home 47% versus 19%, P < .01; median length of hospital stay: 43 versus 59 days, P < .02). The number of stroke unit patients being discharged home had increased significantly from the previous study, with a trend toward improvement in median discharge Barthel Index score. CONCLUSIONS:Stroke rehabilitation units may improve outcome in severe strokepatients. This improvement appears to be due to the development of innovative management strategies that reduce mortality and institutionalization and enable caregivers to support more disabled strokepatients at home.
Authors: Michael T Cudnik; Comilla Sasson; Thomas D Rea; Michael R Sayre; Jianying Zhang; Bentley J Bobrow; Daniel W Spaite; Bryan McNally; Kurt Denninghoff; Uwe Stolz Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2012-02-19 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Cecilie Røe; Erik Bautz-Holter; Nada Andelic; Helene Lundgaard Søberg; Boya Nugraha; Christoph Gutenbrunner; Andrea Boekel; Marit Kirkevold; Grace Engen; Juan Lu Journal: Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl Date: 2022-04-13
Authors: Bianca I Buijck; Sytse U Zuidema; Monica Spruit-van Eijk; Hans Bor; Debby L Gerritsen; Raymond T C M Koopmans Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Susy M Braun; Anna J Beurskens; Susanne M van Kroonenburgh; Jeroen Demarteau; Jos M Schols; Derick T Wade Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2007-10-15 Impact factor: 2.474