Literature DB >> 7482015

An epidemiologic study of episodes of back pain care.

P G Shekelle1, M Markovich, R Louie.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was a prospective community-based, observational design.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology and risk/prognostic factors for back pain episodes of care in a population representing the nonelderly in the United States. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous United States studies of the epidemiology of back pain care have used defined industrial populations or have relied on the patient's recall of symptoms and care.
METHODS: Claims forms from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, a randomized controlled trial of the use of health services, were analyzed. Claims forms were selected if one of the patient-designated reasons for the visit was back pain. Visits were grouped into episodes of care. Descriptive statistics were calculated for episodes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios for independent explanatory sociodemographic and health status variables associated with back pain episodes of care.
RESULTS: The 3105 adults in the Health Insurance Experiment had a combined 11,171 person-years of exposure. Six-hundred-eighty-six persons (22%) had a total 1020 episodes of back pain care, representing 8825 visits. Seventy-one percent of persons had a single episode during the Health Insurance Experiment, and 40% of these episodes consisted of a single visit. There were 9.1 episodes per 100 person-years. Insurance status, geographic site, white race, lesser education, poorer physical functioning, and greater pain at base-line all were independently associated with having a back pain episode of care.
CONCLUSIONS: Back pain episodes of care occur commonly in the adult U.S. population, but usually are brief and recur infrequently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7482015     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199508000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

Review 1.  Methodological challenges in studying recurrence of low back pain.

Authors:  Radoslaw Wasiak; Glenn S Pransky; Barbara S Webster
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

2.  Evaluation of unilateral cage-instrumented fixation for lumbar spine.

Authors:  Ti-Sheng Chang; Jia-Hao Chang; Chien-Shiung Wang; Hung-Yi Chen; Ching-Wei Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying-Chao Han; Zhu-Qing Liu; Shan-Jin Wang; Li-Jun Li; Jun Tan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Racial variation in treatment preferences and willingness to randomize in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Addisalem Arega; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Jon D N Lurie; Tor Tosteson; Jennifer Gibson; Brett A Taylor; Tamara Shawver Morgan; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Pain characteristic differences between subacute and chronic back pain.

Authors:  Mona Lisa Chanda; Matthew D Alvin; Thomas J Schnitzer; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Teaching residents about complementary and alternative medicine in the United States.

Authors:  F B Milan; C Landau; D R Murphy; J J Balletto; T Sztykowski; J A Hart; C H Rybeck; M G Cyr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Efficacy of duloxetine versus alternative oral therapies: an indirect comparison of randomised clinical trials in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Hélène Cawston; Alison Davie; Marie-Ange Paget; Vladimir Skljarevski; Michael Happich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis of multifidus muscles lipid content and association with spinopelvic malalignment in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Izaya Ogon; Tsuneo Takebayashi; Hiroyuki Takashima; Tomonori Morita; Mitsunori Yoshimoto; Yoshinori Terashima; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  [Central pain processing in chronic low back pain. Evidence for reduced pain inhibition].

Authors:  T Giesecke; R H Gracely; D J Clauw; A Nachemson; M H Dück; R Sabatowski; H J Gerbershagen; D A Williams; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vijay Singh; Frank J E Falco; Kimberly A Cash; Vidyasagar Pampati
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.