Literature DB >> 7482013

Spinal cord expansion after decompression in cervical myelopathy. Investigation by computed tomography myelography and ultrasonography.

Y Matsuyama1, N Kawakami, K Mimatsu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study analyzed anatomic characteristics of 44 patients with cervical myelopathy.
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to clarify the patterns of spinal cord expansion after decompression, their relationship to clinical recovery, and the capacity of the compressed spinal cord for restoration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No previous studies have clearly assessed the relationship between morphological changes of the spinal cord and clinical improvement after posterior decompression in patients with cervical myelopathy using computerized tomography myelography and intraoperative spinal sonography.
METHODS: Forty-four patients with cervical myelopathy underwent posterior decompression. The diagnosis was cervical spondylosis in 26 patients and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in 18 patients. The cross-sectional area, sagittal diameter, and frontal diameter of the spinal cord at the level of maximum compression were determined by computerized tomography myelography (performed before and 1 month after decompression) and by intraoperative spinal sonography.
RESULTS: Expansion of the spinal cord was defined as immediate or gradual. Of the 44 patients, 20 demonstrated gradual expansion, and their clinical recovery rate was 68.4%. In contrast, the clinical recovery rate of patients without gradual expansion was only 32.6%. Good clinical recovery was significantly related to gradual expansion. The patients were divided into four groups (A-D) based on the clinical recovery rate and compression ratio. Group A (severe compression and poor clinical recovery) showed a significantly smaller cross-sectional area of the spinal cord than Group D (severe compression, but good clinical recovery).
CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the cross-sectional area of the spinal cord, even when it is severely compressed and deformed, is an important factor in a good surgical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7482013     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199508000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: focusing on the quantitative signal intensity.

Authors:  Jing Tao Zhang; Fan Tao Meng; Shuai Wang; Lin Feng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Myelopathy.

Authors:  D J Seidenwurm
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Anterior migration of spinal cord after cervical corpectomy.

Authors:  Yu Qian; Guojian Xu; Jun Zhang; Xiaofeng Zhao; Dong Wen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  H Baba; K Uchida; Y Maezawa; N Furusawa; M Azuchi; S Imura
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Metabolic Imaging Using Proton Magnetic Spectroscopy as a Predictor of Outcome After Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Langston T Holly; Benjamin M Ellingson; Noriko Salamon
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 6.  Emerging approaches to the surgical management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Subacute post-traumatic ascending myelopathy after T12 burst fracture in a 32-year-old male: case report and surgical result of cervical durotomy.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Huili Wang; Haiying Liu; Guangshun Wang
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2016-07-07

8.  Risk factors for poor outcome of surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  J T Zhang; L F Wang; S Wang; J Li; Y Shen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical myelopathy: an updated predictive model.

Authors:  Josef Bednarik; Zdenek Kadanka; Ladislav Dusek; Milos Kerkovsky; Stanislav Vohanka; Oldrich Novotny; Igor Urbanek; Dagmar Kratochvilova
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the relevance of the spinal cord back shift after posterior multilevel decompression. A systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Denaro; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Alessandra Berton; Giuseppe Salvatore; Luca Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.