PURPOSE: To determine the growTH rate and behavior of small (< or = 3.5-cm diameter) incidentally detected renal parenchymal neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty renal parenchymal tumors in 37 adult patients (mean age, 65.5 years) were observed with computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound for 1.75-8.5 years (mean, 3.25 years). Surgical removal was performed of 26 tumors proved and graded at pathologic examination. Fourteen tumors with CT criteria of neoplasm are being followed up. RESULTS: The overall growth rate of neoplasms was 0-1.1 cm/y (mean, 0.36 cm/y). Thirty tumors grew 0.5 cm/y or less and 19 grew very slowly (< or = 0.35 cm/y). No patient developed metastatic disease. Nine (24%) had multiple neoplasms. CONCLUSION: Most small, incidentally discovered, well-marginated renal parenchymal neoplasms grow slowly and are not an immediate threat to a patient's life. Watchful waiting might be appropriate instead of surgical removal, especially in patients who are elderly or may not survive surgery.
PURPOSE: To determine the growTH rate and behavior of small (< or = 3.5-cm diameter) incidentally detected renal parenchymal neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty renal parenchymal tumors in 37 adult patients (mean age, 65.5 years) were observed with computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound for 1.75-8.5 years (mean, 3.25 years). Surgical removal was performed of 26 tumors proved and graded at pathologic examination. Fourteen tumors with CT criteria of neoplasm are being followed up. RESULTS: The overall growth rate of neoplasms was 0-1.1 cm/y (mean, 0.36 cm/y). Thirty tumors grew 0.5 cm/y or less and 19 grew very slowly (< or = 0.35 cm/y). No patient developed metastatic disease. Nine (24%) had multiple neoplasms. CONCLUSION: Most small, incidentally discovered, well-marginated renal parenchymal neoplasms grow slowly and are not an immediate threat to a patient's life. Watchful waiting might be appropriate instead of surgical removal, especially in patients who are elderly or may not survive surgery.
Authors: Pari V Pandharipande; Debra A Gervais; Rebecca I Hartman; Mukesh G Harisinghani; Adam S Feldman; Peter R Mueller; G Scott Gazelle Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marc C Smaldone; Alexander Kutikov; Brian L Egleston; Daniel J Canter; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Michael A Jewett; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: P Balageas; F Cornelis; Y Le Bras; R Hubrecht; J C Bernhard; J M Ferrière; A Ravaud; N Grenier Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Daiki Ueno; Zuoquan Xie; Marta Boeke; Jamil Syed; Kevin A Nguyen; Patrick McGillivray; Adebowale Adeniran; Peter Humphrey; Garrett M Dancik; Yuval Kluger; Zongzhi Liu; Harriet Kluger; Brian Shuch Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 12.531