Literature DB >> 7480653

Clinical image evaluation.

L W Bassett1.   

Abstract

The radiologist interpreting mammograms is responsible for an ongoing evaluation of the quality of the initial images produced by the facility. The Mammography Quality Standards act requires an external review of clinical images at least every 3 years from each facility accredited. Clinical image evaluation includes an assessment of position and compression, labeling, image quality, and artifacts. For each of these assessment categories, specific criteria have been identified for distinguishing properly performed from deficient clinical images.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7480653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Image Quality Criteria between Digital Storage Phosphor Plate in Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography in the Detection of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Pushpa Thevi Rajendran; Vijayalakshmi Krishnapillai; Sulaiman Tamanang; Kanaga Kumari Chelliah
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2012-01

2.  Comparison of a flexible versus a rigid breast compression paddle: pain experience, projected breast area, radiation dose and technical image quality.

Authors:  Mireille J M Broeders; Marloes Ten Voorde; Wouter J H Veldkamp; Ruben E van Engen; Cary van Landsveld-Verhoeven; Machteld N L 't Jong-Gunneman; Jos de Win; Kitty Droogh-de Greve; Ellen Paap; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Full-field digital mammography: the '30% rule' and influences on visualisation of the pectoralis major muscle on the craniocaudal view of the breast.

Authors:  Julia Strohbach; Jenny Maree Wilkinson; Kelly Maree Spuur
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-06-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.