Literature DB >> 7480633

Adaptive response of the chicken embryo to low doses of x-irradiation.

K Tempel1, S Schleifer.   

Abstract

Chicken embryos were x-irradiated in ovo with 5-30 cGy (=priming dose) at the 13th-15th day of development. After 3-48 h, brain- and liver-cell suspensions were x-irradiated in vitro with (challenge) doses of 4-32 Gy. Significantly less radiation damage was observed when the radiation response was measured by scheduled DNA synthesis, nucleoid sedimentation and viscosity of alkaline cell lysates 12-36 h after the priming exposure. In vivo, pre-irradiation with 10 cGy enhanced regeneration as evidenced by the DNA content of chicken embryo brain and liver 24 h following a challenge dose of 4 Gy. From nucleoid sedimentation analyses in brain and liver cells immediately after irradiation with 16 Gy and after a 30-min repair period in the presence of aphidicolin, dideoxythymidine and 3-aminobenzamide or in the absence of these DNA repair inhibitors, it is concluded that a reduction of the initial radiation damage is the dominant mechanism of the "radio-adaptive" response of the chicken embryo. Sedimentation of nucleoids from ethidium bromide (EB) (0.75-400 micrograms/ml)-treated cells suggests a higher tendency of "radio-adapted" cells to undergo positive DNA supercoiling in the presence of high EB concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7480633     DOI: 10.1007/bf01211545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  38 in total

1.  Cultured mouse SR-1 cells exposed to low dose of gamma-rays become less susceptible to the induction of mutagenesis by radiation as well as bleomycin.

Authors:  P K Zhou; X Y Liu; W Z Sun; Y P Zhang; K Wei
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Very low doses of X-rays can cause human lymphocytes to become less susceptible to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  J D Shadley; S Wolff
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  Chromosomal adaptive response in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  J D Shadley
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  A simple method for detecting drug effects on the DNA of mammalian cells.

Authors:  B Marshall; R K Ralph
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1982-09-01       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  EPR study of mouse tissues in search for adaptive responses to low level whole-body X-irradiation.

Authors:  D A Svistuneko; G Z Ju; J Wei; J S Zhang; S Z Liu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Absence of adaptive response to low doses of X-rays in preimplantation embryos and spleen lymphocytes of an inbred mouse strain as compared to human peripheral lymphocytes: a cytogenetic study.

Authors:  A Wojcik; K Bonk; W U Müller; C Streffer; U Weissenborn; G Obe
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  [Sedimentation of nucleoids from rat thymus and spleen cells following whole-body irradiation].

Authors:  K Tempel; R Heinzelmann
Journal:  Z Naturforsch C J Biosci       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb

8.  Adaptive response to radiation damage in human lymphocytes conditioned with hydrogen peroxide as measured by the cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique.

Authors:  I Domínguez; N Panneerselvam; P Escalza; A T Natarajan; F Cortés
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in the chick embryo during development.

Authors:  A Ignatius; K Tempel
Journal:  Z Naturforsch C J Biosci       Date:  1992 May-Jun

10.  Supercoils in human DNA.

Authors:  P R Cook; I A Brazell
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  1 in total

1.  Low doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: evolutionary origins.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.